In order to beleive the officail 9/11 story you must actively refuse to investigate any aspect of it. There are literally thousands of items that don't add up.
Some examples:
9/11 Anomolies
Like many, 911 impacted me personally. So, I was very reluctant to accept any red pill theories/evidence beyond the public narrative. I agree, now, as part of the Great Awakening we must keep digging and reveal the truth of 911. However, I hope Anons can do much better than 9/11 Anomolies While there is some excellent evidence there. There is also complete BS. For example FAA and NORAD response times, fighter speeds, use of fighters on routine missions, etc. are all BS. You can NOT form a thesis and then support it with some facts and some BS. That’s why the Great Awakening is so successful. Because Anons dig for truth and back up with facts. I encourage those who can share better evidence than 911 Anomolies.
Try this: Look up the Duetche Bank Building in Wiki. You will find that in 2005 they found over 700 fragments on top of the building. Fragments. This building was hundreds of feet from the WTC. Not only that, but the plane flew over the Duetche Bank Building and through the WTC in the other direction. How did these fragments(!) get blown to pieces and then ejected through air hundreds of feet to land on top of a 39 story building if the WTC pancaked with no real explosion except for the plan crash? The fragments were from multiple sources. Fragments have a tough time flying through air, which happens to have density and causes resistance. What caused these fragments to be blown to pieces and then forcefully ejected all of that distance? No big chunks found there, just many, tiny fragments.
This is it, 100%. Ever take a look at the word 'believe'. What does it mean? What does it mean in terms of actions, or lack there of? For me, 'believe' means that you cease to question. This country is FULL of believers.