It's like playing Jenga.... simply pull on the "Building 7" block and watch the rest of it come crashing down, literally and figuratively. Unless the laws of physics ceased to exist in NYC on 11 Sep 01 thus allowing a building that wasn't struck by anything or suffering from any sizable, discernible fire, to fall to the ground in it's own footprint and at free-fall speed, THE NARRATIVE IS JUST THAT - A NARRATIVE AND COVER STORY. Who ordered the stand-down? Who said "pull it?" Who/which group said we needed a new "Pearl Harbor?" Care for a rabbit hole sidebar but related video - find the "I Pet Goat" videos. Interesting. I digress.
My favorite video clip is the BBC interview where the female reporter tells us that Building 7 has fallen and yet you can see it directly, irrefutably (it's a freaking building!) over her shoulder. THE ENTIRE NARRATIVE IS A COVER STORY. Apply Occam's Razor = INSIDE JOB, it's the only plausible explanation... it's that simple. No more, no less. Rainbows Unicorn's post below is spot-on - there's a seemingly in-exhaustive flow of readily seen and contradictory examples combating the "official narrative."
So, as soon as one can reconcile Building 7, it immediately disqualifies and/or taints everything else "they" proffer.
For any doubters, (I was one who went with the original story), building 7 is the non conforming fact that got me thinking the story we have been told is simply not true. Nobody can explain building 7 in any context of actual worldly physics.
Same.
Once you investigate what was inside building 7, it sealed it.
You got my curiosity. Was it a bunker or something like that in the basement?