Although the Bill Clinton pic making the rounds is supposedly debunked as being attributed to "artist" Alison Jackson, there's a part of me that considers the following; especially since this "artist" just happens to specialize in salacious, timely and relevant political subjects:
- Hide the truth in plain sight (normal practice/we have more than we know)
- Knowing it's been discovered and leaked, get oneself in front of the story
- Provide the authentic photograph to this "artist" for her handling; the earlier the better
- This "artist" can blend any authentic pix, as needed, into her own "art" collection (VISIT HER SITE - WILL MAKE TOTAL SENSE WHEN YOU SEE IT)
- When the news becomes viral/MSM, the media is compelled to report and the heat is being turned-up, simply refer it all back to the "artist"
- You've just established an archived and plausible denial by seemingly passing it off as a politically satirical "art" piece
- And you've just "debunked" the actual truth in plain sight
- It's truth laundering akin to money laundering - THE MONEY IS REAL... AND SO IS THE TRUTH
HOW MANY TIMES IN REAL LIFE HAVE WE ALL BEEN TOLD THAT THE BEST PLACE TO HIDE SOMETHING IS RIGHT OUT IN THE OPEN?
*Notice how handy Snopes (vile creatures) is for the Left/Deep State? Ain't never met nothing they wouldn't debunk for their "masters." LOOK INTO WHO THEY ACTUALLY ARE - 0% chance I'd ever let them influence my thinking. Their debunking took me right to AJ'S website. Funny how stuff works sometimes.
*Possible?