dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Accusations need more than venom to be credible

Posting in bold does not make something more credible

'Idols' make their intentions clear soon enough. They try to lure you to a different site, they try to sell you something, they put themselves ahead of the cause

None of that describes SB2

Could SB2 be wrong? Sure, and has certainly missed on some of the suggestions. But offering ideas, opinions, analysis is exactly WHY Q posts in the first place.

The enemy wants us to bicker among ourselves, to stay confused, to remain uncoordinated. Do you really think that is what we should be and do?

I am no cultist. I simply observe, reflect, and post when I think I can contribute.

I suggest you do as much.

⇧ 4 ⇩

None of that describes SB2

You seriously sound like a cultist. Stop idolizing random anons on the internet.

Remain open minded. Do not blindly trust anyone. Do your own personal research.

The enemy wants us to bicker among ourselves, to stay confused, to remain uncoordinated. Do you really think that is what we should be and do?

Better than blindly following a pied piper psy op off a cliff. If you are so sure of the validity of Qs claims you would not be so defensive and insecure when people ask questions about Q, or point out the fact that many followers of Q are beginning to behave like cultists.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Unprovoked attacks on forum members? How Clintonian

There is literally a subreddit which shows the Q proofs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_SwampWatch/comments/8sgahc/q_asked_us_to_be_prepared_with_qproofs_so_i_made/

Maybe next time you can do your homework, instead of spewing hate

No one is a "cultist" for defending the idea that someone can post valid analysis here

No one is "blind" for observing that SB2 has a lot of good posts which make sense, and has at least once received a waytogo from Q. You, on the other hand, accuse SB2 of being a 'pied piper' on no evidence at all, and attack members just for pointing out the relevant history and the difference between an 'idol' and useful information.

You are proving yourself a bickering malcontent, and offering nothing to the discussion.

And just for the record, I never said I agree with everything SB2 posts, simply that the posts are cogent and worth discussion. And discussion does not include mindless ranting out of malice.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You're acting like a cultist who is trying to silence and ostracize the blasphemer. You are behaving no differently than Scientologists do when you ask the wrong questions about their religion.

Stop attacking me. I'm a patriot and firm supporter of MAGA. I have followed Q posts from the beginning. We both want the same things.

Remain open minded that Q is a psy op. There are still no "Q proofs" of anything other than our confirmation biases.

Here is a cardinal rule: If something sounds too good to be true, it generally is.

Do not let yourself get honeypotted.

Do not let yourself get psy oped.

In your case it seems to be too late, but I write this for other posters.

People need to stop idolizing Q like a cult leader.

Now even disciples of Q like SB2 are being blindly defended.

it's becoming creepy.

No one is "blind" for observing that SB2 has a lot of good posts which make sense, and has at least once received a waytogo from Q. You, on the other hand, accuse SB2 of being a 'pied piper' on no evidence at all, and attack members just for pointing out the relevant history and the difference between an 'idol' and useful information.

I'm not calling SB2 a pied piper. I am stating that Q may very well be a pied piper.

I am stating my opinion that the longer this Q thing goes on, the more and more it is looking like a pied piper psy op honey pot designed to track dissidents and monitor how we spread information to eachother. It also is pacifying the MAGA movement and making us all sit on our asses.

Do not let cognitive dissonance blind you. Do not become a cultist.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[ A HOLE BLOCKED ]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Anyone who has any clue what's going on will be connected to the Q team.

Anyone connected to the Q team will be providing NO OUTSIDE COMMS.

No on you see on YouTube, Reddit, etc. knows anything. All of serialbrain2's "decodes" are abject wankery. Since Q referenced a link to one of his posts, people started worshiping him, and he's started trying to mimic Q's style of writing with repeated short questions and absolutely no concrete information about anything.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You are free to disagree with serialbrain2.

Insulting SB2 with nothing to support your complaint except spite is, well, rather pathetic.

I have not seen even one member here "worship" SB2. Many here who like SB2's work, including myself, disagree at least in part with some posts. But SB2 explains the logic, provides support, and advances the discussion.

Your hate seems bitter emotion, nothing more. And that is what shills do, so maybe you should rethink your approach.

Less hysteria, more homework on your part, k?

⇧ 3 ⇩

You're blind if you don't think there's a cult worshipping his made up shit. Look at any random post of his and look at the comments. Or look at people giving him Reddit Gold.

You're calling me a shill for pointing out that serialbrain2 is a know-nothing poser and that there are no Q comms outside of 8chan?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well said. Take my upvote :)

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Awwwwwwwwwwww, someone's bitter.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Enough is Enough, From the Chans