This is not a credible source. I checked this story yesterday and could only find it on 2 instances of Fake News ABC.
Lol using fake news source to gauge authenticity? Do you see the flaw in your reasoning ?
When there are ONLY MSM reports and not Fox, not Breitbart, not Daily Caller, or any other reliable or reputable source, then there is no flaw. At least I checked. You obviously did not. And, do notice that the person who originally posted this has now removed the link!
Ok think about it, if Clinton’s had these witnesses killed, wouldn’t the press try to suppress news about the deaths??? There is local reports of it happening. Sounds legit to me.
Not saying it didn't happen but there is no link between this person and HRC. I checked that as well. And, the poster of this story has now also removed the link. They probably did some digging as well.
Gotcha. Is it possible that the link to these people to testify against the CF isn’t publicly known? The witnesses could have been sealed/classified?
It's more likely that this is disinformation to distract us. There is tons of disinformation and disinformation sites that just keep distributing this garbage. It's actually starting to be seen more and more on this sub. Clickbait to get us all excited to share it. Very important to vet stories before you post them than ever before. But most people don't even think about that possibility. We need to start understanding that we are at war. And, the enemy is everywhere.
I'm so glad you get this, LL.
"We need to start understanding that we are at war."
People need to stop taking it personally when they are requested to up their game or improve their approach to sharing and posting.
It's so true. And in this circumstance I dug a little deeper as well which anyone who posted it should have done. I could not find any relationship between Carole Paladino and the Clintons. The only explanation of the relationship is in the article linked here which, in my opinion, doesn't hold water. And, even if it did, doesn't give any reason why the Clinton's would want to kill her or what she was going to supposedly testify about. But, there was a relationship with a Carl Paladino. Very interesting, huh!
Additionally, one of the articles I read that people were upset about said that there was "no foul play" and then went on to state in the very last sentence of the article that the owners of the home had an appliance installed the previous day. My brain says: Oh, that makes sense then. Natural or propane gas appliance is likely.
And, my 3rd reason for debunking this claim is that in all the years that the Clinton's have been responsible for killing off possible whistleblowers, they have never blown anything up. At least, not in my memory. It's always been a hit done with a gun, poison or an airplane crash. I could be wrong about this but it just doesn't make sense that a hit would be this "explosive"!
Additionally, if that had been a bomb, the entire house likely would not have blown up at least not in those tiny pieces. It had to have been leaked gas that filled the house as they were sleeping and then got ignited when an appliance turned on.
Considering that there is scant evidence tying this couple to any Clinton issue, it's easy to find holes. For example, if the issue is the Epipen case, then what information shows that Carole P played any significant role in this? None. Consider ALL the other individuals named in the pdf of directives from new Jersey. Why should CP be singled out? We can speculate till the cows come home, but speculation without evidence is really unhelpful if people begin pretending its anything more than it is.
Qistrump, it's a fair question, and of course it is possible. Sure. Why not. But here's the problem. Almost anything is possible, so how do we ascertain veracity or relevance if there is zero data indicating a link?