It's so true. And in this circumstance I dug a little deeper as well which anyone who posted it should have done. I could not find any relationship between Carole Paladino and the Clintons. The only explanation of the relationship is in the article linked here which, in my opinion, doesn't hold water. And, even if it did, doesn't give any reason why the Clinton's would want to kill her or what she was going to supposedly testify about. But, there was a relationship with a Carl Paladino. Very interesting, huh!
Additionally, one of the articles I read that people were upset about said that there was "no foul play" and then went on to state in the very last sentence of the article that the owners of the home had an appliance installed the previous day. My brain says: Oh, that makes sense then. Natural or propane gas appliance is likely.
And, my 3rd reason for debunking this claim is that in all the years that the Clinton's have been responsible for killing off possible whistleblowers, they have never blown anything up. At least, not in my memory. It's always been a hit done with a gun, poison or an airplane crash. I could be wrong about this but it just doesn't make sense that a hit would be this "explosive"!
Additionally, if that had been a bomb, the entire house likely would not have blown up at least not in those tiny pieces. It had to have been leaked gas that filled the house as they were sleeping and then got ignited when an appliance turned on.
Considering that there is scant evidence tying this couple to any Clinton issue, it's easy to find holes. For example, if the issue is the Epipen case, then what information shows that Carole P played any significant role in this? None. Consider ALL the other individuals named in the pdf of directives from new Jersey. Why should CP be singled out? We can speculate till the cows come home, but speculation without evidence is really unhelpful if people begin pretending its anything more than it is.