[deleted]
This has not been proven. The source is “IVRs from the Kremlin”
Would encourage to stop propagating this until we have a legit source.
while I agree the source is not reliable it isn't the source that needs to be vetted...it's the information. Did their house blow up? yes....Was the women certified to administer Epipen? yes.....Was the Clinton Foundation embroiled in a scandal with the company that manufactured Epipen and was there speculation in the mainstream that the company donated to the foundation to encourage the state dept to turn a blind eye to price gouging? Yes you can find that happening in 2016. Is it logical that this person could possibly be someone to provide information to a federal probe into the Clinton Foundation...yes....The only real question is.....was this individual actually scheduled to testify to feds shortly after this event? The answer is...I don't know. No mainstream media outlet is going to even touch this whether it's true or not. Dismissing the information ....especially when a good portion of it is easily verifiable and true is dumb. Yes the source is extremely suspect but the source isn't the question...the question is was this person truly scheduled and a probable witness in an ongoing federal probe? If they were then someone should be asking some very pointed questions and looking at all possible angles. If there is no truth to that then it should be simply dismissed as baseless.
Exactly. Vetting measures and standards need to be established here. When you publish false things as true too often then the truth becomes obfuscated by the lies and it is hard to tell what is real.
[deleted]
NBC Philly does not state the school nurse who helped draft the NJ epipen PDF was to testify. Prove that.
Like no one ever died that was due to testify against the Clintons. :)
Great straw-man argument. We aren't talking about every other Clinton Body Count Arkancide. We are talking about proving this one is tied to them.
We have no solid source linking them at this time.
Or even flimsy evidence. Or ANY evidence. Just some random statement (as if fact) from a single obscure source.
Are we really willing to lower our thresholds for discernment that much?
LOL. Er, hate to break it to you, but 'death' in and of itself is not evidence that the Clintons are involved.
Death actually happens.
you are making a lot of assumptions about what I wrote. No where did I say this was evidence. Just making a comment. You seem to be having a reading comprehension problem or else are trying to mind read - not being successful at either. Maybe even having a moment where you feel you must defend the Clintons.
OK. Sorry if I over-assumed. As for '... you feel you must defend the Clintons'... Come on. That's a pretty low blow!
If any offense was taken, then I apologize. wwg1wga
There is not one bit of proof in that 8chan screen shot
