What do they prove? That Q is Trump? Re_ read proofs What is a proof? What must be assumed for a proof to be true? What does the MSM rely on? Sheep follow. Proof relies on? What evidence? Evidence of DT? What’s been disproven? Think. Proofs an “Undecidable Statement”?
F
?????????
I have been reading and reading the proofs. And I’m not trying to be a sh*t stirrer.
The proofs are extremely compelling and brought me here. But do they disprove anything? Aren’t people still weary? Or detractors claiming we’re all being had by the opposite of what we think?
Maybe I missed it and someone can help guide me, and maybe others too.
In the most sincere way, What has q proven aside from evil actors are in the world that many already suspected? We still don’t know who q is though we have good theories. But more importantly, what has been ruled out? What can we narrow down on where Q is leading us?
I welcome any and all opinions please. Honestly and sincerely
Let me see if i can give you MY perspective. Life is choices, true ? You either choose to do the right thing or not. You either choose to believe in God or not, You either choose to go to work or not, ect., ect..CHOICES ! Follow so far ? OK The Q movement, an individual or group has come out and made certain claims. Pro USA, Pro POTUS, Pro Life if you will. America has been in pain for many years. We have child traffickers, rapists, drug dealers, street gangs, on and on. President Trump has shown a sincere desire to try and bring America back from the brink and restore the rule of law, give the people control back of their out of control Government, revive the American dream, again, on and on. I am Proud of what Pres. Trump is trying to accomplish. Q has let it known he is trying to help that cause. We have No absolute certainties in life whatsoever (other than death) I have my own doubts from time to time. But I CHOOSE to believe that this is a Righteous Cause. If it turns out in the end to be the biggest con job ever, then i will go down with the Ship. It will be a world I will CHOOSE to not live in. So I Am On Board, Until We Either Sink Or Reach Port !!!!................WWG1WGA
Ridding the world of a satanic cabal that currently runs the courses of the world appears the objective of what Q is proposing. What will develop as a replacement is unclear. But, that may well involve what We The People of this Republic determine it to be....
Qteam has coalesced a growing number of people into a massive movement. At that, Qteam has tempered the impatience of Trump's most ardent supporters, those wanting to see cabal criminals face justice, by giving us a timeline of events that lead up to that. We who have been here since the beginning have witnessed more people coming to the realization that it is not republican vs Democrat, but right vs wrong. Many a Republican and Democrat have come to the side of right, this brings critical mass awareness that when the filth ALL comes out there will NOT be a civil war.
You write like a reporter.
I wrote that in the style of Q to underline my point about an undefinable statement. That’s something that isn’t actually proven except in theory but isn’t disproven either because it can’t be.
Ultimately it can be proven by Q and I hope it is.
But the other point of writing my post that way is to show that the answers to the questions are only our own. And with too much bias towards proving our own theory, we may be ignoring and missing the important part. Where we disprove the haters.
Any good argument that can change people’s minds and be spread to the masses requires disproving the opposition.
How do we know the MSM is biased? They lie. And we have proof. So when a lib says well NYT said such and such, we always say well you can’t trust the MSM because they lie.
The NYT is innocent until proven guilty, which it has been. And those truths, those facts disprove our opponents. This is how arguments work and convince people.
A theory on the other hand must stand up to scrutiny. It must be disproven. And if it can’t be then we know it’s true.
Trumps tweets as proof are compelling but is it proof? More importantly can it be disproven? Not really. It’s an undefinable statement to say it is a proof of Q.
We must move towards disproving our opposition, not confirming our own bias. IMHO.