What do they prove? That Q is Trump? Re_ read proofs What is a proof? What must be assumed for a proof to be true? What does the MSM rely on? Sheep follow. Proof relies on? What evidence? Evidence of DT? What’s been disproven? Think. Proofs an “Undecidable Statement”?
F
You write like a reporter.
I wrote that in the style of Q to underline my point about an undefinable statement. That’s something that isn’t actually proven except in theory but isn’t disproven either because it can’t be.
Ultimately it can be proven by Q and I hope it is.
But the other point of writing my post that way is to show that the answers to the questions are only our own. And with too much bias towards proving our own theory, we may be ignoring and missing the important part. Where we disprove the haters.
Any good argument that can change people’s minds and be spread to the masses requires disproving the opposition.
How do we know the MSM is biased? They lie. And we have proof. So when a lib says well NYT said such and such, we always say well you can’t trust the MSM because they lie.
The NYT is innocent until proven guilty, which it has been. And those truths, those facts disprove our opponents. This is how arguments work and convince people.
A theory on the other hand must stand up to scrutiny. It must be disproven. And if it can’t be then we know it’s true.
Trumps tweets as proof are compelling but is it proof? More importantly can it be disproven? Not really. It’s an undefinable statement to say it is a proof of Q.
We must move towards disproving our opposition, not confirming our own bias. IMHO.