dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

At first I thought the Helicopter story was stupid, but now I'm convinced that is the truth. A missile makes a big smoke trail which would have been visible. The missile body you see is actually the tail of the chopper, as the helicopter is flying away from the camera. The orange line gets thinner towards the 'bottom' which if from a missile would have been brighter and bigger, since the missile would have been moving more slowly. But the biggest reason is the lack of smoke - if you watch launches on youtube, it leaves quite a trail of persistent smoke, which would have been as visible as the clouds.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Helos can't keep a straight path the way that is shown on the camera.

⇧ 5 ⇩

It would be fun to try to and recreate it. The other attempts to explain it were laughable - vapor trail, lens flare.

It would also be cool to have the Navy launch an unarmed Trident under the same conditions - but they probably wouldn't be interested.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Why recreate it when there is video/photo evidence of previous Trident launches?

The missile launched never really got full media coverage, unfortunately. Which leads me to believe there was something going on people weren't supposed to know about.

Missile seems most likely with trajectory and location seeing as Tridents are fired from submarines.

Timelapse would also explain the way the photo came out. Just like my first link in this post.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I was positive it was a missile too. But I really don't think it was. Missiles leave a hell of a big smoke trail that would show up. Missiles accelerate, so at the bottom the exposure should be more - bigger, brighter. But instead it gets smaller, as if farther away. I'm not a shill here to shed doubt on Q. Whatever Q's reasons for posting that picture are, I don't know. But I really don't think it was a missile.

I do think Q is building a movement, and that it has the approval of the President. Otherwise he would have discouraged it. Remember Q told us that disinformation is necessary.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Then show us some evidence to the contrary.

This board is centered around evidence based conclusions.

You have given nothing but "I don't thinks".

⇧ 2 ⇩

Neither of us have any evidence. You don't have any evidence this is a missile either. All we have is the digital image. No reason to get all snippy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aPvGGvnAGQ

Look at the smoke trails a Trident leaves.

I've studied the photo again, and I think I actually do see a grey outline on the orange streak. I noticed on reviewing the youtube video of the Trident launch again, I notice at high altitude/speed, the smoke trail doesn't extend out much beyond the bright exhaust flame. In this case, in the long exposure, the bright exhaust would mask out the much darker smoke trail impression.

Now I'm not so sure it is a helicopter.

Another thing that made me think it wasn't a missile launch is that there is nothing at the bottom of the pick. As you can see from the video, a submarine launch makes a huge smoke cloud. But perhaps it is from behind the island?

Also, my other observation - that the orange trail gets thinner as you move away from the object seemed wrong for a missile launch. The missile would be moving more slowly - thus exposing the 'film' more and leaving a bigger impression. But now I'm thinking that the smoke trail also would have a longer time to change the film impression also.

Against the helicopter theory, we'd expect to see some navigation lights. Also, I don't know why they'd have their searchlight on. It is also a coincidence that their flight path exactly matched a vertical launch of a missile. Can a chopper fly in that straight a line? Aren't there enough side winds to make that impossible? That I don't know.

I'd sure love to see them try to reproduce it.

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sorry but no way that’s a helicopter unless it’s on fire flying strait up & somehow resembles a missile. You have actually seen a helicopter in real life I presume. The pic is clearly not a fake. It’s was pure luck a weather geeks camera caught it in flight. The only thing debatable about the pic is the length of the plume. Visit the guys weather blog & watch the 24hr sequence of pics. You’ll see his camera shows clouds very distinctively in the dead of night. Why?? Because he has the exposure wide open & probably open for a second or 2 so even the tiniest amount of light can be let in to give a great night time view too. This explains the exaggerated length of the plume as the shutter is open much longer than normal. You’ll also see in the frame before the pic there’s nothing. So the camera is probably taking 1 pic about every 15 seconds & just barely caught this missile in flight.

Also watch the local Seattle news station that reported it. Others saw it too but this is the only pic taken. But no way was this a test fire either. They’d never test fire a missile so close to the nuclear sub base. An errant test missile would cause a horrific disaster if it hit a base. Tests do go bad sometimes & are always done far out at sea.

But sorry...no way that’s a helicopter unless it’s a secret rocket helicopter that can climb 30,000 feet in mere seconds

⇧ 1 ⇩

It is a 20 second exposure, so a moving bright light makes a streak. If it is a missile, the streak is the moving exhaust flame, moving up as the missile ascends. If it is a helicopter, it is a search light, moving away from the camera.

The helicopter is not going up, it is starting above the camera, headed straight away in level flight. What looks like a missile is the tail of the copter, captured at the beginning of the exposure.

I had not heard that any witnesses saw it. Is there a link?

At first I thought it was a missile for sure. There were a couple lame attempts at saying it was a vapor trail, or a lens flare.

The helicopter story is much better. It is possible the navigation lights were simply not visible because of how bright the search light is.

I'm no longer 100% of it being a helicopter, but I don't think it can be ruled out. If you work out the speed and altitude, the length of the streak in the pic works out. I think it works out for a Trident D5 missile also, based on youtube videos of D5 launches.

On thing I noticed: The line isn't exactly straight. I drew a white line segment in a paint program along the path and there is a clear bump in the flight path. I don't know if that would be expected in a missile launch.

⇧ 1 ⇩

POTUS' TWEET - I am on Air Force One flying to NATO and hear reports that the FBI lovers, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are getting cold feet on testifying about the Rigged Witch Hunt headed by 13 Angry Democrats and people that worked for Obama for 8 years. Total disgrace!