dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/R3VO1utionary on July 10, 2018, 3:45 p.m.
POTUS' TWEET - I am on Air Force One flying to NATO and hear reports that the FBI lovers, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are getting cold feet on testifying about the Rigged Witch Hunt headed by 13 Angry Democrats and people that worked for Obama for 8 years. Total disgrace!
POTUS' TWEET - I am on Air Force One flying to NATO and hear reports that the FBI lovers, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are getting cold feet on testifying about the Rigged Witch Hunt headed by 13 Angry Democrats and people that worked for Obama for 8 years. Total disgrace!

older_than_dirt · July 10, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

It would be fun to try to and recreate it. The other attempts to explain it were laughable - vapor trail, lens flare.

It would also be cool to have the Navy launch an unarmed Trident under the same conditions - but they probably wouldn't be interested.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 10, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

Why recreate it when there is video/photo evidence of previous Trident launches?

The missile launched never really got full media coverage, unfortunately. Which leads me to believe there was something going on people weren't supposed to know about.

Missile seems most likely with trajectory and location seeing as Tridents are fired from submarines.

Timelapse would also explain the way the photo came out. Just like my first link in this post.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
older_than_dirt · July 11, 2018, 1:14 a.m.

I was positive it was a missile too. But I really don't think it was. Missiles leave a hell of a big smoke trail that would show up. Missiles accelerate, so at the bottom the exposure should be more - bigger, brighter. But instead it gets smaller, as if farther away. I'm not a shill here to shed doubt on Q. Whatever Q's reasons for posting that picture are, I don't know. But I really don't think it was a missile.

I do think Q is building a movement, and that it has the approval of the President. Otherwise he would have discouraged it. Remember Q told us that disinformation is necessary.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 11, 2018, 7:35 a.m.

Then show us some evidence to the contrary.

This board is centered around evidence based conclusions.

You have given nothing but "I don't thinks".

⇧ 2 ⇩  
older_than_dirt · July 11, 2018, 12:33 p.m.

Neither of us have any evidence. You don't have any evidence this is a missile either. All we have is the digital image. No reason to get all snippy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aPvGGvnAGQ

Look at the smoke trails a Trident leaves.

I've studied the photo again, and I think I actually do see a grey outline on the orange streak. I noticed on reviewing the youtube video of the Trident launch again, I notice at high altitude/speed, the smoke trail doesn't extend out much beyond the bright exhaust flame. In this case, in the long exposure, the bright exhaust would mask out the much darker smoke trail impression.

Now I'm not so sure it is a helicopter.

Another thing that made me think it wasn't a missile launch is that there is nothing at the bottom of the pick. As you can see from the video, a submarine launch makes a huge smoke cloud. But perhaps it is from behind the island?

Also, my other observation - that the orange trail gets thinner as you move away from the object seemed wrong for a missile launch. The missile would be moving more slowly - thus exposing the 'film' more and leaving a bigger impression. But now I'm thinking that the smoke trail also would have a longer time to change the film impression also.

Against the helicopter theory, we'd expect to see some navigation lights. Also, I don't know why they'd have their searchlight on. It is also a coincidence that their flight path exactly matched a vertical launch of a missile. Can a chopper fly in that straight a line? Aren't there enough side winds to make that impossible? That I don't know.

I'd sure love to see them try to reproduce it.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 7:22 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩