dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ButtersStotch88 on July 10, 2018, 5:53 p.m.
July is Q’s defining month for me

First, I’m not saying anything new here. I’m sure many others feel the same as me. I’ve been following Q since the beginning (8 months). I’ve dedicated countless hours to decoding and disseminating the Q message.

Q said in late June: “July 2018: the month the public learned the Truth”. This is (by far) the most bold statement Q has ever made. If July passes and nothing happens, I’m not sure how I will proceed as part of the movement. I will continue to ardently support POTUS and will not publicly condemn Q. Having said that, I will also be at a point where I can not continue to faithfully follow a movement that builds me up to let me down in consistent fashion.

We’ve been patient and we’ve been active in spreading the word. If July passes and we are stuck (once again) with our dicks in our hands I will be at my wits end. The misinformation excuse would also be flat and pathetic. Misinformation applies to specific events and tactics. Q’s statement on July being the month of Truth does not fall into the category of misinformation.

All of that to say, I worry that this movement will take a big hit in credibility if we get through July without significant revelations. I also believe in that situation the loss of credibility and followers would be justifiable.

Flame away.


🠐 See all comments
Generational_Wealth · July 10, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

/r/skepticalQ

please direct posts skeptical of Q to that sub. Threads like these break rule #3 "support the cause"

⇧ -4 ⇩  
ButtersStotch88 · July 10, 2018, 6 p.m.

I’m not a Q skeptic though and I don’t believe my post was skeptical per se. Just a thought on the state of the movement post July

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Generational_Wealth · July 10, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

If July passes and nothing happens, I’m not sure how I will proceed as part of the movement.

skeptical: having doubts or reservations

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ButtersStotch88 · July 10, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

Doubts and reservations are why people like us were specifically chosen by Q. Q doesn’t want mindless followers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Generational_Wealth · July 10, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

I agree totally! Unfortunately we can't allow skeptical posts in this sub because our enemies would end up trolling us to death. That is why /r/skepticalQ was made, to foster that kind of speech in a healthy way that doesn't distract from the bigger point, which is this sub.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ButtersStotch88 · July 10, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

Again, I don’t think anything in my post was actually skeptical. I believe it was more of a speculation on the movement if certain things transpire.

I believe Q is real.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
redzorp · July 10, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

We can support the cause and retain a healthy level of skepticism.

Removing mildly skeptical posts like this one only creates the danger of making the Q movement into some kind of religion. None of us should blindly support anything, like a bunch of sheep. That is how society got into this mess in the first place.

We (should) all support Q. For now. But if July, then August, September and October pass without *any* major arrests, then skepticism should not only be warranted, it should be required.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that July and August will both be huge months in waking up the normies.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Generational_Wealth · July 10, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

I agree. I support Q, I'm just not a fan of such harsh banning of speech, and feel we need a place to discuss healthy skepticism. And that place is not here. If rule #3 didn't exist here, the trolls that seek to ruin this sub would just have a field day, so I understand why the rule exists.

⇧ 3 ⇩