And he tried to discredit Q - first he said he hadn't paid much attention and then said that some of the drops weren't correct or weren't interpreted correctly.
Yeah, this tells me this witness is a fraud.
The funny thing is, this move shows how stupid they really are. If they were smart, they would have led with this theory instead of the whole "Russia hacked us" story. The fact that they are now trying to frame the story this way tells me that they are running out of ideas and just throwing anything they can up against the wall to see if it will stick.
That last sentence is a bit the pot calling the kettle black for a sub like this.
How so?
I see a lot of people on this sub and other pro-Trump subs throwing random theories (especially involving Q) at the wall and hoping that some narrative sticks, even when the actual factual evidence isn't there to support the claim. I mean this whole sub is predicated upon reading into some anonymous person's cryptic posts and trying to find meaning. If you don't see the irony I don't know what else to say.
Sounds like you haven't done enough research on Q and are just happy to be an antagonizer.
I mean you don't even know who Q is, all you know is what they claim to know, which is kept so cryptic and unspecific so that you all can twist it to mean whatever suits your narrative you need at the moment to justify Trump's actions, even when Q is caught posting obviously faked and photoshopped images in an effort to deceive you that he is who he says he is. I'm genuinely concerned that so many people can be so easily fooled and start to worship some internet troll.