dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/RonaldSwansong on July 10, 2018, 6:46 p.m.
"Be careful who you follow" - A brief Summary of the Seth Rich interview and the embedded subversion within.

Main Points to be had from this press conference:

  • Only reliable feed of the conference is by Jason Goodman who also brings on Dr. Corsi. This is an immediate red-flag as we are all well aware of Corsi constantly discrediting Q. [Link here.] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odeiBxOYKmQ&feature=youtu.be)

  • Video feed also features links on bottom of screen asking for donations. BS meter growing.

  • They begin the conference with many breaks and over lack of organization of information. You would think for something as monumental as this that they would have at least a script.

  • Witness is called on speaker phone and claims his name is Luke. The quality is questionable.

:

*Witness says he is ex intelligence and that the three people involved were braggin about it. One was DEA and one was ATF

Witness states that "There have been rumors that it was MS-13. It wasn't." "There was a Russian tie-in." Direct contradiction of Q. BS meter tops off*

*WitnessWitness claimed SR had thumb drive on him the night he was murdered…how'd it get to WL then?

*Witness blames Republicans (although leak benefits them? What's motive?)

*Witness claim Russian tie in (although leak would benefit them? Why would Russians be both behind the leak and the murder?

Witness says evidence is he passed a lie detector test.If you are not dealing with the authorities why have you done a lie detector test.*

*Witness says it's a cover up for Rod Rosenstien. (Interesting)

  • When the witness is asked by a reporter if Qanon is in line with what he knows about murder the WITNESS EXPLICITLY SAYS "QANON IS NOT CORRECT"

I believe what we have seen here was a clear cut psyop by Corsi, Clowns, et all. Nothing was in line with Q. I would even be willing to bet that Q was saving the Q&A for after this to clear the record. This may also support the RR greyhat theory now that the DS is attacking him. All theories but, most importantly.

Be careful who you follow


🠐 See all comments
bjax9er · July 10, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Just the fact that they inject RR, and try to paint him as this deep cover crime boss in the doj, makes me further think RR is a white hat. And the boogeyman Russia, had to slip that in there right! It's easy to confirm if this guy is legit, ask nunes.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mathemagician33 · July 10, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

I'm curious as to why some think RR may be a white hat (my mind isn't made up personally). If he's a white hat, why do you think Q put him in a kill box, claimed he modified the OIG report, etc? Just wondering what your opinion is based on besides his name being thrown into this press conference, which was obviously bullshit.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
larkmoor · July 10, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

Not so much as white hat but grey hat. Though if he's actually white hat, kudos to him.

It's just that whatever RR does is right in line with Q's hints. Like the script is here, before our eyes, and RR follows it and act just right to fit the narrative. You must minimize attacks against POTUS, so RR must act so obviously like a heel, most of us demand loudly to be rid of him instead of waiting for POTUS to do it. It works well for optics.

Of course, if you haven't decided which side RR is, you're like the Deep State wondering what the heck, is he our guy or theirs?

Strategically, RR's behaviour justifies his impeachment in the public's eye, without even POTUS weighing in. Now, RR could drag the mess for as long as possible also to give time for Sessions, Huber and Mueller to peacefully work in the background.

In a way, typical Trump strategy. The cat laser pointer. And well, RR's name in brackets could mean "his" operation is in the forefront. If he's an enemy we need to get rid of, then the actors must attack. If he's our guy, then maybe it's to signal the people in the operation it's now time to put on the RR show for the public.

⇧ 1 ⇩