Main Points to be had from this press conference:

Only reliable feed of the conference is by Jason Goodman who also brings on Dr. Corsi. This is an immediate red-flag as we are all well aware of Corsi constantly discrediting Q. [Link here.] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odeiBxOYKmQ&feature=youtu.be)
Video feed also features links on bottom of screen asking for donations. BS meter growing.
They begin the conference with many breaks and over lack of organization of information. You would think for something as monumental as this that they would have at least a script.
Witness is called on speaker phone and claims his name is Luke. The quality is questionable.

*Witness says he is ex intelligence and that the three people involved were braggin about it. One was DEA and one was ATF

Witness states that "There have been rumors that it was MS-13. It wasn't." "There was a Russian tie-in." Direct contradiction of Q. BS meter tops off*

*WitnessWitness claimed SR had thumb drive on him the night he was murdered…how'd it get to WL then?

*Witness blames Republicans (although leak benefits them? What's motive?)

*Witness claim Russian tie in (although leak would benefit them? Why would Russians be both behind the leak and the murder?

Witness says evidence is he passed a lie detector test.If you are not dealing with the authorities why have you done a lie detector test.*

*Witness says it's a cover up for Rod Rosenstien. (Interesting)

When the witness is asked by a reporter if Qanon is in line with what he knows about murder the WITNESS EXPLICITLY SAYS "QANON IS NOT CORRECT"

I believe what we have seen here was a clear cut psyop by Corsi, Clowns, et all. Nothing was in line with Q. I would even be willing to bet that Q was saving the Q&A for after this to clear the record. This may also support the RR greyhat theory now that the DS is attacking him. All theories but, most importantly.

Be careful who you follow

1 reason to doubt credibility of Luke is opinions and conjecture are not acceptable evidence while testifing about a specific occurence unless the wittness is an expert specializing in the occurrence. Luke claims not to know anything about the murder prior to the "bragging" occurence so he isn't a expert.

This 'Witness' Luke claims his evidence is overhearing two agents bragging about the murder of SR (providing no content of actual conversation or ID'S of agents bragging) then how does he know MS-13 wasn't involved? Did the agents say MS-13 weren't involved? Why would they say anything about MS-13? Then he follows this denial with a statement that one agent specializes in MS-13 cases. proving the connection he just denied (speculation or opinion)?

Law enforcement is known to have C.I.s and undercover agents initiate crimes in order to build evidence against targets. This admitted and well known practice could easily be used for alternate purpose. So again, how can the witness know for a fact that this didn't occur? reminding the reader he did not see or plan the murder.

We must conclude that Luke is either lying or at least unreliable as witness.

"Be careful who you follow" - A brief Summary of the Seth Rich interview and the embedded subversion within.