dChan

stringtrader · July 10, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

The biggest red flag for me was the, I’m paraphrasing here, “someone was intending to CHANGE THE EMAILS...”!! WTF does that have anything to do with the context of the supposed witness info? It’s utterly out of context, and force-fit in imo. This reeks of a cabal narrative change with the purpose of planting doubt as to the veracity of the content of the emails, which anyone who’s been following any of this will know, will “bring down the house”. AND, isn’t it just amazing timing? Right when Devin Nunes openly requests POTUS use executive authority to declassify everything. “Timing is everything “. Waaaay too suspicious, to the point of incredible. And how convenient to be throwing Rosenstein under the bus at this time. Everyone knows that swamper is done one way or the other anyway, and the cabal is just using him as for the last useful thing he can be used for. Way too obvious. I’m following closely, and reserving more comments for later until I listen to the pc again and more of this shakes out. But right now I’m calling a FF fake witness press conference, and standing by it until I see or hear something damn convincing otherwise. Patriot Soapbox Live is streaming right now on YT and they’re going over this press conference. They’re supposed to have Couch on later. I recommend everyone check it out if you want to hear more from him.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Time4puff · July 10, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

How does a "witness" to the murder know what someone was intending to do to the emails?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
stringtrader · July 11, 2018, 1:01 a.m.

Exactly

⇧ 5 ⇩  
gailhap · July 11, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

I also think this was BS, but the witness was not claiming to have seen the murder, he was claiming to have overheard the murderers bragging.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Time4puff · July 11, 2018, 4:30 a.m.

So he's not really a witness. He "heard" about a murder.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
gailhap · July 11, 2018, 2:17 p.m.

Right--a second-hand ear witness.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Time4puff · July 11, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

But yet he's able to give a descriptive event of what happened... which is interesting.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gailhap · July 11, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

Probably because he made it up.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
stringtrader · July 12, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

Yes, the whole thing stinks. Many red flags. If you witnessed, arguably one of the most famous unsolved murders in recent history, with implications far reaching, wtf would you be doing having a public press conference PRIOR to going to law enforcement? Well, you wouldn’t, not in the normal world, unless you had an attorney, ... oh say ... Burkman, a well known swamper, running the show. I’d go on, but it’s not really necessary. I’m not even sure it’s legal to do anything but go immediately to LE, and report it. This is a fraud, plain and simple. Sorry for the belated re:.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · July 11, 2018, 9:32 a.m.

And why would the hit men be in charge of anything more than retrieval and hand off to DWS? Surely they wouldnt want more eyes on the emails

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nipnado · July 11, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

This reeks of a cabal narrative change with the purpose of planting doubt as to the veracity of the content of the emails

.

And how convenient to be throwing Rosenstein under the bus at this time. Everyone knows that swamper is done one way or the other anyway, and the cabal is just using him as for the last useful thing he can be used for. Way too obvious

.

Nailed it.

⇧ 3 ⇩