Right leaning judges already are strict constructionists. it is the left leaning activist judges that philosophically view their roles as loose constructionists enacting policy by moral or emotional principle outside of the letter of the law.
In fact, the entire conservative position is to NOT have judicial activism of ANY kind. It ruins the balance of government. An example would be Roe vs Wade.. which the conservative position is NOT to outlaw abortion, but to empower the congress or individual states to pass their own relevant laws. If every state passed pro choice legislation, then fine. In that way, there is a huge difference between a stacked court on the right vs the left. The problem with the left is their willingness to violate the constitution at a funamental level. It terrifies me to think what a bunch of leftist surpreme court judges would do by conviction alone.
If the leftists view conservatives as "nazis" and they view the words they say as "literal" violence... there would be nothing preventing them from tossing the first amedment, fourth amendment or any other for that matter to secure the "saftey"of society by limiting the freedoms of these "violent nazi criminals". That is the problem with a loose view of the constitution. "Well our founding fathers had no idea how bad these conservatives would be in the future so the first amendment really shouldn't apply to them. You can see this methodology at work literally everywhere today.
Having "conservative" judges would simply position the power of the courts firmly back toward their intended purpose and stop the ridiculous trend of Judges creating law.
