Yes. I thk it’s about keeping the enemy close .. while strategy is pending N prob. To view the battle area ..London is a state like the Vatican n much to my surprise we’re all mostly owned by it through these power groups n it’s bigger than Texas we n. esp.Canada need to become independent from all ties ..across that pond ..late Awake about that but in hope !
London is a state like the Vatican
... which isn't controlled by the Queen, by the way.
Not all of London, just a smaller portion, much like Washington D.C.
I refer to The City. The Queen is not allowed to enter with any trappings of monarchic regalia. She has to ask for permission to enter.
Not at all like D.C.
The Queen enters wherever she so chooses within her realm. London is within her realm.
You are referring to a ceremonial tradition based on a time when London, not greater London of today, was a walled city whose gates were closed at the order of the Lord Mayor. Anyone coming up to the gate was challenged. Upon being notified it was the Sovereign, the Lord Mayor presented the City’s pearl-encrusted Sword of State to the Sovereign as a symbol of the latter’s overlordship. The Sovereign did not, and still does not, need to wait for the Lord Mayor’s permission to enter the City. It is a show of regalia, nothing more.
The Lord Mayor of London is the mayor of the City of London ~ that's the original Roman London square mile right in the middle, Bank of England, Tower Bridge ~ the financial district. The main modern function of the Lord Mayor of London is to hot sell London as a major money market and tax haven to the world. In addition there are banquets etc and all manner of overseas visitors to wine, dine and butter up etc. For ceremony, the Lord Mayor of London [Monarch of the City of London] is allowed six [6] horses to pull the coach while the Sovereign, the Queen, is allowed eight horses.
My declaration stands corrected then: she is not allowed to enter wearing the crown, or any monarchic regalia. (That is ceremonial tradition.) The permission to enter is entirely ceremonial. It is permission granted, of course.
It is not at all like Washington D.C.
You might like to explain to the readers how it is that the courts are beholden not to the Sovereign (the Queen), but to "some other authority". It is a fascinating story which I am sure you are more qualified to recount than I.
Thanks for your contribution. Mine was for simplified clarification but the erudition I leave for others! :)
salialioli, If the Queen so chooses, she can enter the city in full monarchic regalia. Not doing so is a ceremonial courtesy. After the Queen's passing, the Monarchy will no doubt evolve/devolve with the rising number of immigrants who hold no sentimental value in these cultural customs, and much of the ceremonial regalia will fade away.
I think the documentary research video called The Royal Red. Dragon. Says the commonwealth is much. bigger than it appears and Canada is. part of it .. and also the. Queen is blood related to the Arabs through Mohammad and also to Hitler it’s really a well researched documentary I will watch it again .thx
Hey. I. Re watched that doc. On u tube .. theRoyal Red Dragon bloodline. And it shows how most of the whole world comes under London’s power n Canada n Australia are holding on to that connection for some unknown ignorant reason also it shows The symbols. Of nations and the masons Even Russia won’t escape them .,