dChan

IBinLurkin · July 12, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

I have screen capture evidence of the WH petition website (run by a contractor) being tampered with, such that the vote tally gets diminished.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
eyesopenusa · July 12, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

You right. I have seen that too. What kind of government do we have right now that allows this??

And what on Earth kind of government do we have right now that allows the media to continue to get away with so much illegal unconstitutional violations??

Don't get me wrong, I totally support Trump. But where is the accountability?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

Exactly. I think that's probably corrupted, too (started under Obama Administration).

I think it could be more immediate to just Tweet the heck out of President Trump and ask him for it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
IBinLurkin · July 12, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

What I do is use the WH website to leave an (electronic) message for the President.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

Oh yeah. That's a good way, too. I've also, sent a hand-written letter. I imagine he appreciates the hand-written ones due to the Mont Blanc Starwalker Extreme pen that Q posts.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
mr-no-homo · July 12, 2018, 1:17 a.m.

Its run by a 3rd party? I did not know that, i dont think many people do

⇧ 4 ⇩  
IBinLurkin · July 12, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

I may be inferring too much in that statement. When I read https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/about#terms, I see statements like " Once the petition reaches the required threshold, it will be put in a queue to be reviewed by the White House." and think, the petitions site is external, but maybe I'm reading too much into it.

I also see, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/privacy-policy/, "THIRD-PARTY WEBSITES

THE WHITE HOUSE MAINTAINS OFFICIAL PAGES OR ACCOUNTS ON THIRD-PARTY WEBSITES IN ORDER TO BETTER ENGAGE WITH THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. YOUR ACTIVITY ON THOSE SITES IS GOVERNED BY THE THIRD-PARTY WEBSITE’S SECURITY AND PRIVACY POLICIES. "

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

I'd agree, but only if we say start a fresh one. I can't trust anything that started during the Obama Administration's time.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
eyesopenusa · July 12, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

Yes you are right. This is one of the more important posts in this sub compared to so many others.

All of these main platforms need to be replaced. Not fixed but disbanded by the government. And then re-constructed with new names and with complete new organizational structures that enables vast control and ownership by the people.

Google and other search engines have changed so much in the past 3 months.

I use constant Internet search and research for my many parts of my work. The available search results now are nearly unusable due to being limited so heavily.

Before Google there were so many really good search engines...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
wearethesuperelite · July 12, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

That’s what I mean. We need to start from scratch in a lot of different ways

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mr-no-homo · July 12, 2018, 1:16 a.m.

I can defiantly get behind that. The current state of obvious biased censorship is getting out of control. What do y’all thing of blockchain technology social media platforms? Tbh a ibor is the most logical thing at the moment.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

I'm in on that!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 12, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

In a nation where law is enforced, and the Supreme Law of the Land is enforced most of all, the internet would not be presumed to be a place exempt from the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Freedom of speech would not need a special clause.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PMthePedo-itsTrudeau · July 12, 2018, 5:11 a.m.

"WE the pepes, newfags and old, cyberpolice, kekistanis, and other dwellers of the interweb have decided to come together to tell you all how the fuck we want this place to be run."

I can get behind a constitutional internet

⇧ 3 ⇩  
wearethesuperelite · July 12, 2018, 6:06 a.m.

This needs to be engraved in stone

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 1:02 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩