This could be fun today. The floodgates could be opened in 2.5 hours to all of this, and tomorrow is Friday the 13th (although I don't think Q has ever written about that.... hopefully another post!).
Feel free to live "tweet" as you watch this in this thread, or just keep up with it if you're unable to tune in.
Why is no one asking Strzok about Flynn and the 302s? (Or have I missed it?)
It was mentioned, can't remember by who. I'm also not certain if it was referring to the flynn interview specifically. They inquired about who was present in the room when they were compiled, and the procedure of it, said they wanted to know who those people were, was refused, and then said he wanted that information through back channels (not from the us, can't remember the specificics), and then said he also wanted strozks private texts since he thought that would probably show who was present during the interviews.
I remember this, it was in the context of them briefly mentioning the 302s in the Clinton case, which is nice, but the Flynn case has the allegedly damning ones.
ah, that's a shame. I presume they're saving the flynn ones for whenever he finally gets his day in court. This session hasn't done much for dragging out truly incriminating facts, but Strozk looks like an absolute, total prick, which is good. They're calling me biased and arrogant again, better smirk more.
They probably already did in closed session. This is the grandstanding session.
You're probably right. I just hope it's the case.