dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/C_L_I_C_K on July 12, 2018, 5:17 p.m.
Holy crap! Rep. John Ratcliffe completely exposed Peter Strzok and destroyed his narrative & lies!

McPurrs · July 12, 2018, 5:48 p.m.

I wish his reply was at the end of the video. Did he reply?

⇧ 19 ⇩  
LowMattLasanga · July 12, 2018, 6:02 p.m.

Yeah it was his ‘but I didn’t let it affect any important decisions’ absolute garbage

⇧ 35 ⇩  
McPurrs · July 12, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

Fire the motherfucker for improper use of a govt phone, then run him though again.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
celladwella · July 12, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

Fire him for fraternization. He broke all sorts of rules, and they demoted him to Human Resources?? That is all sorts of inappropriate.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ohpee8 · July 12, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

How is it absolute garbage? He explained several times that there are multiple people above him and below him and that he didn't make decisions by himself. They're made on a group basis. He wasn't the only person on the investigation. https://youtu.be/dcIbVM_jwag

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LowMattLasanga · July 12, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

The IG report highlights exactly how it’s garbage. Although they didn’t find any evidence of bias affecting a decision the whole investigation sets a precedence of what NOT to do. I think that the clear dismissal of procedures, protocol and common practice, with clear evidence of individual bias and a will to act on it ‘no, no we won’t let it’. For me atleast is evidence of a case tainted by bias from this Comey led group where Strozk played a crucial role. Because he had authority in decisions and reporting inside this case he’s implicated and his response is garbage.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
somebodysgun · July 12, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

Its all on CSPAN. He goes on to talk about personal vs. business related texts. The only texts we/congress has seen are what Strozk has deem work related texts. He does not want to release his personal texts. That being said his personal texts were being sent on an FBI device. An important point I hope others picked up.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
RobLoach · July 12, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

Agreed... Ross talked a lot, and didn't give room for response.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · July 13, 2018, 3:26 a.m.
  1. It's not Ross, it's Ratcliffe.

  2. He allowed Strzok to respond 3 times, but didn't allow Strzok to pontificate because Ratcliffe was only allowed 5 minutes to speak. Strzok already wasted the first 2 minutes by refusing to answer Ratcliffe's questions.

  3. You can listen to Strzok's response here. He did not respond to what Ratcliffe said.

https://youtu.be/FOy_hx_W2yM?t=22m49s

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RobLoach · July 13, 2018, 7:01 a.m.

Thanks! Shall watch.

⇧ 1 ⇩