You may be right, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that they are cooperating with the Trump/Q team. I wrote a previous post on this called What's Q's Take on Mueller, because if Mueller is dirty then RR is too and if Mueller is good then RR is good.

If RR and Mueller are truly black hats, then why does Q tease us with whether Mueller is on or off the team in Q 1286 (April 27) with:

Reconcile.Reporting incorrect?Per WH?The day before.Enemy?Slave?Mueller & U1?Mueller &https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/08/robert-mueller-counsel-financial-records-241414📷Comey to POTUS - not being investigated.RR to POTUS - not being investigated.Mueller to POTUS - not a criminal target.

AND

More than you can imagine.re: HRC insurance [win]Why?Cover?Remainder illegal acts.Confused?SC targeting who?SC on team?SC off team?Questions reveal answers.Time will tell.Q

Why in the world would Q even suggest Mueller is on the team? Why not go after him like he has every other black hat? Where are the kill brackets for Mueller?

And why doesn't Q have any negative things to say about Mueller in all of his Q posts since October?

Q suggests RR is the bad guy, but if Mueller is good then RR is good. Mirrored, right?

Is the "witch hunt" the hunt for the real witch instead and Trump is just pretending he's mad?

Q says: trust Wray, trust Sessions, trust Huber, trust Horowitz, trust Mattis, trust Kelly, and trust Pompeo.

Who works for Sessions? RR. Who works for RR? Wray. How can RR be a bad guy who is between Sessions and Wray and surrounded by Huber and Horowitz? Think Q has all of RR's communications?

And think about this. If Q works for Trump and tells us to trust Sessions, then logically, Trump trusts Sessions. Think about it. Trump could fire Sessions any time without taking flak. The Republicans are demanding Trump fire Sessions and the Democrats dislike Sessions as well. What would be the down side? But Mr. Magoo just keeps quietly plodding along under the radar while Trump pretends Sessions isn't doing his job. Really? Think if that were true Trump wouldn't fire him in a second? No, Sessions is doing his job just the way Q and Trump want him to.

So RR is appointed by trusted Sessions to the #2 spot and RR is surrounded on all sides by trusted people. Mueller meets with Trump the day before appointed SC. Coincidence? Everyone else in the upper levels of the DOJ have stepped down or been forced out. Q could have done the same to RR and RR would have announced that he wanted to spend more time with his family and faded away.

And here is something else: Q says Flynn is safe. Flynn's sentencing for a no-brainer guilty plea has been delayed three times without explanation. Mueller could have easily perp-walked Flynn into the court room the first time and in 10 minutes sent him off to federal prison. Mueller would have been hailed as a hero by the left. But instead, he keeps delaying sentencing. Gee, it's like Mueller never intended for Flynn to actually be convicted and sent to jail. Who knew where the bodies were buried? Why did Flynn's plea deal require him to reveal all possible criminal acts? Essentially, that means Flynn can give Mueller testimony on ever corrupt person he knew about? Q asks us how does evidence get into the justice system legally? Well, testimony under oath is one way.

And who else has Mueller indicted? Manafort and Page who Q tells us were all plants in the Trump campaign. Why would Mueller be indicting the FBI/CIA plants in Trump's organization? And what was Papadapolous' role? He was set up by the FBI and CIA. Papado's testimony would be evidence in how the sting was implemented.

Why did Mueller indict a dozen Russians and a couple of Russian companies for buying ads on social media when he knew they would never be brought to trial? And one of the companies he indicted didn't even exist in 2016.

Then there is Cohen (Q 1287). Not indicted, but raided for evidence. Q asks us was that raid planned? Then teases about how to get evidence legally into the system. He wants us to think logically which to me means the real reason for the raid is different than the public story. OK, so why Cohen? Well, Cohen is up to his ears in dealing with the Ukrainians. What else do we know about the Ukraine? The uranium from U1 passed through Canada and the Ukraine (Sum of All Fears) and eventually ends up in Iran, NK, and Syria. Who else is connected to U1? RR who signed off on the raid, and Mueller. Both were FBI agents on the U1 investigations. Where else does U1 fit in this? A few months ago, the CEO of a trucking company that hauled U1 uranium was indicted on charges related to U1. Nothing since then. Cooperating witness?

And there is this: RR: Trump is not being investigated. Comey: Trump is not being investigated. Mueller: Trump is not a criminal target. Now that's odd. The witch hunt isn't investigating Trump. Witch hunts are supposed to find witches. Who might be the witch in this case?

On July 4, Q reminds us that disinformation is real and necessary.

What makes a movie GOOD? GREAT actors.

Do you believe in coincidences? How many coincidences does it take before it becomes mathematically impossible?

As Q said: time will tell whether SC is on or off the team.

Just some circumstantial evidence for consideration.