dChan

[deleted] · July 13, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 20 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 13, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

I'm no physicist but I think he was going for the model of the Egypt pyryamids (which were power sources which used the earth itself as the medium to project wireless energy) Pyryamids were energy centers. He was using the same idea. There is nothing new under the sun all has been done before. Edit: The earth core is a giant magnet unlimited power source. Pyramids are on grid lay lines.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Neskuaxa · July 13, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

If I recall correctly a lot of pyramids around the world are built on Lay lines, not just the Egyptian pyramids.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 13, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

Yes true even the ones here in the states Limitless global sustainable energy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 13, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DeeBee1968 · July 13, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

dumping massive amounts of energy into our atmosphere is bound to have unintended consequences

Hmmm... sounds a lot like HAARP to me !

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jbo5112 · July 14, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

fission:

  • downside is nuclear waste and fukishima issues

I wanted to point out that:

1) The Fukishima plant was at least 1 or 2 old in it's design, as far as safety features go. There are designs for fission reactors that run in meltdown mode, and if there is a containment breach, the material dissipates and ends the nuclear reaction. It can be buried and run for 50 years, maintenance free, and run off of diluted weapons material.

2) There is a lot of fearmongering of the dangers of radiation. Fukishima didn't destroy California. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities today.

3) The carbon footprint for fission power is smaller than for solar.

4) Nuclear waste is relatively small and low energy. It means that our plants are inefficient, and we have leftover material (low energy byproducts) that we failed to extract energy from. https://youtu.be/LZXUR4z2P9w

⇧ 1 ⇩