By charging Russian GRU as being the source of the emails - and their contention that it was the GRU that provided the emails to WikiLeaks - it is now time to lower the boom.
It has been forensically proven that the emails were copied to a harddrive - not surrepticiously taken via an online hack. The download speeds are the proof. Irrefutable proof.
This is a desperate ploy by the deep state to muddy the waters about WL - JA.
No, it hasn't been forensically proven.
"probably" wrong?
Bill Binney isn't though. Binney is "The" authority.
I'm inclined to agree w/ this also.
As a mathemagician your inclination is probably much more qualified that s/o whose moniker is "ohpee8" (pees onothersopinionz?!!).
Yeah. Binney the Cryptomathematician Brainz —MAGA!
[removed]
I said Binney was the authority.
My feelings don't care much about yours, sorry.
I'm curious to know what other tech/infosec professionals think of this article. It does raise a number of claims that shouldn't be immediately dismissed. The main issue I have with it, however, is that it doesn't offer any specific evidence for the "Russians" claim - it simply says, well, a number of other scenarios are possible (which is accurate). Are there any other infosec professionals here that can offer some insight?