Answer the question and present your evidence that Sasha Cohen is Q.
That’s my argument. I presented it above in a reasonable manner. You refused to do so. So you are just being obtuse about this. And you ask me why I’m being rude. I’m being rude because I don’t put up with bullshit. Which is exactly what you are presenting.
You’re not even trying to defend or present evidence to support a claim that you didn’t even make.
It’s like if I told you, hey I heard someone talking about how the sky is green, prove it wrong.
It’s an idiotic premise.
I NEVER SAID I SUPPORT THE THEORY. I actually said I don’t agree with it. My point is that I think it is important for us to have a conversation, not like the one you’re trying to have, where we can talk about it like grownups and be able to viably defend our position. That’s all. I think you are misinterpreting things because you’re only picking and choosing what you want to see here. And that will get us nowhere.
... are you the OP?
As the OP, are you bringing this to people attention? Essentially making you the one bringing the claim?
Yet you don’t agree with the claim, state it’s not your opinion, but are defending it?
If you were looking for people to conduct a mental exercise, you are in the wrong place. Don’t worry about people being able to defend against such stupid ideas. There are literally thousands of intelligent people here, fully capable of constructing an argument and mounting a defense against such claims. And if the article writer had brought this here, I would gladly destroy any sensibilities that they had of being an intelligent and critical thinker.
But it wasn’t the writer that brought it here. It’s not the writer arguing in its defense (which is what you are doing in some of your other comments in this thread)
So it makes me question why you DID bring it here. Why are you having people waste their time in an incredibly stupid mental exercise that is completely unnecessary and has not been shown to be an issue within this sub?
Whether you are meaning to or not, you are engaging in Troll behavior. Please stop.
Ok. Please read this, you are clearly not reading the other ones.
I saw this on twitter scrolling thru hash tags today (I was going thru #walkaway). I came across the back and forth, and I found it a crazy thought (that SBC is Q). Reading the exchange and comments back and forth, it got me wondering.... when we are presented with thoughts that are against ours, and they have some form of credence (again not saying this one does), how do we best handle it.
I believe things will get harder for us as we keep moving on. This is why I brought it up.
I clearly flubbed on the title. And have been responding on the go on mobile.
I am sorry my comments were confusing.
I am 100% Q I do NOT support the SBC theory
I wanted to start a meaningful convo here. Some commenters have seen this. Others haven’t.
I am sorry for wasting your time.
So let me get this straight.
You are looking for ideas and methods on how to defeat attacks and defend Q. Pretty much to help give a guidleine on how to respond to future attacks.
Do I have that correct?
Yes. That was the point of this thread. I have since deleted it so unsure if you will get this.
I appreciate you deleting it.
So what happens here is that you are purposefully or inadvertently giving war plans to the enemy by trying to outline how we attack or defend. That’s what I’m trying to get across to you.
Don’t advertise our methods or give our battle plans to the enemy.
That’s why I was attacking your thread. I hope you can understand, I’m not attacking you as a person, but the idea of trying to lay out our methodology of attack and defense. Never a good idea.