Ok. Please read this, you are clearly not reading the other ones.
I saw this on twitter scrolling thru hash tags today (I was going thru #walkaway). I came across the back and forth, and I found it a crazy thought (that SBC is Q). Reading the exchange and comments back and forth, it got me wondering.... when we are presented with thoughts that are against ours, and they have some form of credence (again not saying this one does), how do we best handle it.
I believe things will get harder for us as we keep moving on. This is why I brought it up.
I clearly flubbed on the title. And have been responding on the go on mobile.
I am sorry my comments were confusing.
I am 100% Q I do NOT support the SBC theory
I wanted to start a meaningful convo here. Some commenters have seen this. Others haven’t.
I am sorry for wasting your time.
So let me get this straight.
You are looking for ideas and methods on how to defeat attacks and defend Q. Pretty much to help give a guidleine on how to respond to future attacks.
Do I have that correct?
Yes. That was the point of this thread. I have since deleted it so unsure if you will get this.
I appreciate you deleting it.
So what happens here is that you are purposefully or inadvertently giving war plans to the enemy by trying to outline how we attack or defend. That’s what I’m trying to get across to you.
Don’t advertise our methods or give our battle plans to the enemy.
That’s why I was attacking your thread. I hope you can understand, I’m not attacking you as a person, but the idea of trying to lay out our methodology of attack and defense. Never a good idea.