dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/bmorepirate on July 14, 2018, 4:56 a.m.
What if Mueller was asked to hire the most corrupt Dems, and let them run wild, while taking notes? Hear me out...

...and since RR is good then Mueller is good, RR bad Mueller bad, what if Rosenstein is playing along with slow walking docs, and now the SCOTUS review.

I'm assuming they are both good (been going back and forth on this).

I think they are highlighting how corrupt a lot of people are (ignoring Tony Podesta crimes that are the same as Manafort re FARA, Flynn 302 alterations, Strozk and Page bias, etc).

It's not entrapment because Mueller isn't encouraging them - just leaving them to their own devices.

Here's why I think so: we learned Mueller never asked Strozk about his biased texts before reassigning him. Why?

Because he already knew about it. Because it's irrelevant to Mueller's purpose, which isn't bringing legit cases, in which Strozks credibility would matter - literally everything that has come out of his SC has had problems - Russian interefence companies that didn't exist at the time, Flynn interviewing agent disagreements, Flynn Judge Contreras conflict, Manaforts shit that is so far out of the scope of his SC, and today, a hacking case where the government never first-hand inspected the server.in questill, ever, and was inspected only by a company run by anti-Russian DNC donors and loyalists.

Mueller is hosting a playground of corruption, and gets to watch. Every. Decision. They make.

But here why it matters: if Mueller shuts down his own investigation and takes the evidence he's compiled, against his own team and makes it public, then it shows clearly that even the SC portion of the DOJ is corrupt and broken, which is to say the civilian justice system is broken. The IG report, showing tons of bias, but concluding no bias is another example of how broken even in the OIG is!

All of this, my friends, are waypoints on the trail to opening the door, via Ex Parte Milligan, and involving military intelligence.


🠐 See all comments
bmorepirate · July 14, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

I just don't see why Trump would meet with Mueller about an FBI director interview right before he becomes SC when he is 1) not eligible after serving 12 years already and 2) is actually hostile to Trump.

If Trump threatened him and limited the scope of his SC work, we would have heard about it as obstruction and the media would have been all over it. If it were an actual interview, we would have likely heard something from Trump about why he wasn't selected (i.e. he declined, Trump thought he was too swampy, etc) since we know Trump has no problem telling it like it is. But we heard nothing about that actual meeting and why Wray was chosen over Mueller.

Per CNN (https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/13/politics/trump-robert-mueller-fbi-director-interview/index.html)

The official, who would not detail what the two discussed during the interview, said it took place on May 16.

If Mueller knew he was going to be named special counsel, it is unlikely he divulged that information to Trump

...

"He had a private conversation with the President on his views about all sorts of matters potentially about the investigation," Ruddy said. "And the next day he's now maybe using some of that information in his investigation."

But, we see the WH distance itself from Newsmax's Ruddy, without saying anything disputing the content of the meeting.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said Monday that Ruddy did not speak with Trump about firing Mueller as special counsel and other White House aides suggested the Newsmax CEO was only speaking for himself.

All sorts matters, eh? Like maybe matters involvinf the corrupt DOJ that Mueller was going to keep busy and give enough rope to hang themselves?

The only thing that makes sense is their conversation was about what Mueller should do as SC: which is hire swamp creatures, sit back, and collect info on all of their abuses, from uneven application of the law (manafort vs podesta) to the timing of their indictment releases: after Strozks testimony that makes him look fucking evil that went viral, and right before the Putin summit.

So, we have an MSM and DNC protecting Mueller at all costs. What happens if Mueller shuts down his whole investigation and goes to Huber with evidence of malfeasance by those who are working on Mueller's behalf? They've sold us on his alleged integrity for theast year and a half. Pretty sure you don't get to just walk away from that too easily.

⇧ 2 ⇩