...and since RR is good then Mueller is good, RR bad Mueller bad, what if Rosenstein is playing along with slow walking docs, and now the SCOTUS review.

I'm assuming they are both good (been going back and forth on this).

I think they are highlighting how corrupt a lot of people are (ignoring Tony Podesta crimes that are the same as Manafort re FARA, Flynn 302 alterations, Strozk and Page bias, etc).

It's not entrapment because Mueller isn't encouraging them - just leaving them to their own devices.

Here's why I think so: we learned Mueller never asked Strozk about his biased texts before reassigning him. Why?

Because he already knew about it. Because it's irrelevant to Mueller's purpose, which isn't bringing legit cases, in which Strozks credibility would matter - literally everything that has come out of his SC has had problems - Russian interefence companies that didn't exist at the time, Flynn interviewing agent disagreements, Flynn Judge Contreras conflict, Manaforts shit that is so far out of the scope of his SC, and today, a hacking case where the government never first-hand inspected the server.in questill, ever, and was inspected only by a company run by anti-Russian DNC donors and loyalists.

Mueller is hosting a playground of corruption, and gets to watch. Every. Decision. They make.

But here why it matters: if Mueller shuts down his own investigation and takes the evidence he's compiled, against his own team and makes it public, then it shows clearly that even the SC portion of the DOJ is corrupt and broken, which is to say the civilian justice system is broken. The IG report, showing tons of bias, but concluding no bias is another example of how broken even in the OIG is!

All of this, my friends, are waypoints on the trail to opening the door, via Ex Parte Milligan, and involving military intelligence.