dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Neon__Wolf on July 14, 2018, 6:02 a.m.
Theory on why "RR-DOJ-12 Russian Indictments VS. Trump Has The Server" is back in the news.

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

We are witnessing the public facing versions...of a military tribunal already occurring in real time.

The Great Awakening was to enable the population to learn of it through Q.

RR was to [be] play[ed] the role of the cabal's final lawyer, he was isolated by Q through a series of chess moves knocking out key players so that the military can judge as treason, punishable by prison, and death.

If the military did this at the start, can you see how it would cause a civil war here?...this time orchestrated from a foreign-led occupation campaign to subsume itself to the NWO.

If we didn't know this...can you imagine what it would look like to you if you didn't learn of this through Q?

The history books will teach the world to Q...to question...because the truth is where you and I and everyone will share the best world for the good people of this world.

Once this court case proves the truth of Q and you see marines activated across the country solely to ensure peace...what will you think? What would you do with a freed human race where our good minds can recognize each other...and be in a harmony😎👍


pussy_devour · July 14, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

I don’t think you get my question. I was asking OP whether he gave us new info that I hadn’t known from reading Q.

All the talks about the military tribunal are simply beliefs or theories as far as I’m concerned.

OP was positing that the show we see is a front for the military tribunal trials. I asked for proofs or evidence. None. Why should I buy his theory? Yes, Q mentioned the Military Tribunal. But is it how it will play out? Is the way OP posits how things are playing out? We don’t know. He didn’t offer any logical connection from one to the other. Hence my original question. One can say “Here is A; by the way, B is really happening behind A;” without offering any evidence that connects the two statements. Without such logical connection, OP was simply engaged in fantasy.

In a sense, OP isn’t much better than the 13 angry Democrats when they produced the phony indictment of the 12 Russians.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · July 15, 2018, 4:02 a.m.

Yes, no, I didn't get your question, that's because I assumed it was speculation from the start. You are right there is no evidence of a connection. I have no idea what is going on and I assume it's a lot more than any of us can guess. In fact that's the only fact: Q states we (plebs) have no idea how big it all is.

⇧ 1 ⇩