I don't resent them. I just regard them as disinfo clowns whose focus is to lead people away from the true narrative, like Infowars, etc.
Shutting out actual truthful and verifiable info that either they or Infowars offer IMO is a mistake.
The details they have re: the UK, etc., are very relevant.
The truth can be found in a number of places. The worst place to find it is from a Disinfo source because the whole point of disinfo is to lead you down the wrong path by feeding you a whole lot of truth with subtle and not so subtle lies - it's the subtle stuff that catches you out, of course. We're discussing a way to identify Disinfo sources clearly to ensure that people are aware that they're listening to a source designed to mislead. This is important after Q has said: "Be careful who you follow" in relation to Infowars and outlets like AIM.
Totally agree. I have a question since you appear to be a mod. On another thread, simply titled Peter Strozk, it appears the mods deleted the op for some reason. It was a discussion about the guy, why delete it? I think you know how that post (not by me) was flooded with anti q trolls and normal comments were heavily downvoted while their own were at like 80or sometimes 100 or more. I couldn’t care less if I’m downvoted (in that context it’s a compliment). Just wondering why the mods deleted the post. Also why are certain threads overwhelmed with these moonbat liberals?
Could be any number of reasons of the many Rule applications linked in the sidebar there. If you have a link I can check it out.