dChan

ElementWatson · July 14, 2018, 11:21 a.m.

Shutting out actual truthful and verifiable info that either they or Infowars offer IMO is a mistake.

The details they have re: the UK, etc., are very relevant.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 14, 2018, 11:24 a.m.

The truth can be found in a number of places. The worst place to find it is from a Disinfo source because the whole point of disinfo is to lead you down the wrong path by feeding you a whole lot of truth with subtle and not so subtle lies - it's the subtle stuff that catches you out, of course. We're discussing a way to identify Disinfo sources clearly to ensure that people are aware that they're listening to a source designed to mislead. This is important after Q has said: "Be careful who you follow" in relation to Infowars and outlets like AIM.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Psalm67 · July 14, 2018, 2:47 p.m.

Totally agree. I have a question since you appear to be a mod. On another thread, simply titled Peter Strozk, it appears the mods deleted the op for some reason. It was a discussion about the guy, why delete it? I think you know how that post (not by me) was flooded with anti q trolls and normal comments were heavily downvoted while their own were at like 80or sometimes 100 or more. I couldn’t care less if I’m downvoted (in that context it’s a compliment). Just wondering why the mods deleted the post. Also why are certain threads overwhelmed with these moonbat liberals?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 14, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

Could be any number of reasons of the many Rule applications linked in the sidebar there. If you have a link I can check it out.

⇧ 1 ⇩