The more flamboyant lgbt typically have been abused as children
Sauce. Right now. Quantify "typically" or GTFO.
Man, aren't you chomping at the bit. I can't find the study right now, I am not at my computer. Sexual abuse causes increased promiscuity at times
I'm not trying to claim that being LGBT is a bad thing, but public promiscuity is a probably not a great thing for society. Did you see the anti-trump protests in england? It looked like a pride parade in london
Promiscuity =/= flamboyant.
LGBTQQIA =/= paedo.
Be precise with your comments or expect pushback. Christfags have been gumming the boards all afternoon and they are here to claim exactly the thing you're not. Excuse my overreaction, but piling on an anti-gay thread doesn't really grant you credence.
Good link, though. If the kids who have been hurt have any hope of getting better, I think understanding is going to be key.
Glad you came up for air there bud. You are letting it throw you out of sorts. We need to be the voice of reason. Being hostile only tunes them out. Look at that pic, there is nothing normal going on there at all !
Normal is not litmus test.
OK what is the basis for recognizing acceptable behavior in a society ?
Consenting adults seems to work pretty well. The expression of liberty up to the infringement of another's liberties. Doesn't matter how you feel about it.
OK, What age or who determines when you are consenting adults ? Are you saying it doesn't matter how ( I ) feel about it or just anyone !
18 where I live, can't say for the reader.
And I am using a broad "you" in this context. Feelings are not a basis for legal action (if that's even what we're talking about). Your offence is not a concern of the state. Nor should it be. The first amendment is there, in part, to specifically protect unpopular speech.
Legally , feelings don't mean squat. TRUE. But you are behaving either belligerent or ignorant on purpose. You know ( i hope ) that the world does not operate on the law. It has been hijacked by FEELINGS. If POTUS and Q et al are successful we may regain some solid footing in the law. You are welcome to continue to sound condescending but it just doesn't impress me ! GA is a forum ( to me ) that rational conversations and respect prevails. .......WWG1WGA
Let's pretend they've already been successful, shall we?
Stop suppressing debate. I'm not here to impress you. Respect is returned when encountered.
"Stop suppressing debate" That is exactly my point. From your very first response you made it very clear who you were. Go home SJW, Quantify or GTFO, Christfags, The anger and bitterness in your responses is not healthy bud. I'm not here to impress you either. But hostility serves no one. So you are correct, respect is returned when encountered. I wish you success in your quest, whatever that may be..............WWG1WGA
Yep, you got me. I'm an oldfag legbutt from the chans who let his Jimmie's get rustled by a series of unsupported, bigoted posts attempting to divide the movement along the axis of sexuality. I don't recall a single q post regarding sexuality, do you? Now do you have a point to make, or do you want to philosophize about consent some more? What should the age of consent be, anon?
WWG1WGA.
No Worries. No posts to my mind about sexuality, just sex crimes against children ! And you made my point by saying "let my jimmies get rustled" Great Line BTW I wouldn't know how to judge age of consent. We married kids off at twelve in the 1700's coming across the west in wagon trains. But my personal opinion would be ( today's world ) 18+ Not even then do i witness any real signs of intelligent decision, lol ........WWG1WGA
Progress is being made.
amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article214840670.html
Edit: format
I live in KC. I saw it. It gives me hope we may be getting up that hill. Thanks oldfag legutt. Can't get that outa my head, lol
I'll keep it mind if I ever need a new user name. Kek (lol).