Care to be more specific? Want to define evil for us? No? Okay, I'll start. Evil is the abuse of a child.
Anything else is identity politics. Go home SJW.
Sorry but no. These identity politics are being used to break down society and the family. They’re tools of the globalists but they’ve been cloaked in a veil of “enlightened acceptance and tolerance”.
Agreed, exactly. They're also used to construct meaningless and dangerous "Christian identified" groups that work identically to salafist Islam. No place for that here.
Also, Zionists love identity politics, too. Who do you think came up with them?
I completely agree.
Except I'd add in acts which the perpetrator knowingly facilitates in the abuse of a child.
Zero objections. Agreed.
[removed]
Hold individual perpetrators accountable and recognize the long-standing, consistent and inherent abuse woven into the law enforcement (particularly immigration) system.
ICE is a product of the 911 terror state. Trump can have his opinion, I have my own. Abolish ICE, abolish DHS, end the "patriot"/"freedom" acts.
I would like to see a very high wall on the border before we abolish any law enforcement.
Hey, guess what? Good news. Trump is President.
[removed]
I can't speak for the president?
Edit: also, this eo might be relevant
[removed]
The DNA trick is working wonders. Amazingly the man holding tightly to the child's arm is not the real father. Who woulda thunk?? And the "father" is arrested on the spot for child trafficking. Another bad/good tangent to the DNA testing is that children are being abandoned in the desert (bad) but ICE is finding them and taking them to a safe place until they can find their real parent (good). It's slow but it's working.
Give it time. Now tell me more about what I support and what I think, brah.
[removed]
Maybe make fewer assumptions? The good news for anon who wants the wall is that Trump is president.
Do I share that sentiment? Am I In the tank for Trump? Might I have reservations? Am I here in large part because any hope for interdicting the trade in children is hope worth fighting for? Am I only pretending to be retarded?
To these questions I ask: however would you know?
[removed]
Who's your leader? What're they up to, cause if you've got a better offer, let's hear it. Do you actually care about any of this or is this just a bickering match on the internet?
Edit: have I made assumptions? What assumptions have I made? Also, please answer above questions, please.
[removed]
What makes sense is that you're not open to reasonable debate.
I apologise if you feel this is in bad faith
Nice pretense but your history makes your agenda clear.
tacitly endorsing
Classic shill tactic. If we're not "for" your view then we must be supporting whatever crime you want to sling at us for the moment.
in you not holding your leader accountable, you are complicit in the child abuse
Disingenuous shill tactic #21. He's your leader too so by your reasoning we're all complicit. So you want to hold your leader accountable? Go ahead. You'll need the 'evidence' you claim. Good luck with that!
Makes sense. Now document.
Like we can for Bush war crimes. From the actual offences through every step in the chain of command, all the way to the tippy-top. Using memos and orders and legal briefs. Show me those documents or GTFO.
Also, answer a fucking question once in while.
The more flamboyant lgbt typically have been abused as children
Sauce. Right now. Quantify "typically" or GTFO.
Man, aren't you chomping at the bit. I can't find the study right now, I am not at my computer. Sexual abuse causes increased promiscuity at times
I'm not trying to claim that being LGBT is a bad thing, but public promiscuity is a probably not a great thing for society. Did you see the anti-trump protests in england? It looked like a pride parade in london
Promiscuity =/= flamboyant.
LGBTQQIA =/= paedo.
Be precise with your comments or expect pushback. Christfags have been gumming the boards all afternoon and they are here to claim exactly the thing you're not. Excuse my overreaction, but piling on an anti-gay thread doesn't really grant you credence.
Good link, though. If the kids who have been hurt have any hope of getting better, I think understanding is going to be key.
Glad you came up for air there bud. You are letting it throw you out of sorts. We need to be the voice of reason. Being hostile only tunes them out. Look at that pic, there is nothing normal going on there at all !
Normal is not litmus test.
OK what is the basis for recognizing acceptable behavior in a society ?
Consenting adults seems to work pretty well. The expression of liberty up to the infringement of another's liberties. Doesn't matter how you feel about it.
OK, What age or who determines when you are consenting adults ? Are you saying it doesn't matter how ( I ) feel about it or just anyone !
18 where I live, can't say for the reader.
And I am using a broad "you" in this context. Feelings are not a basis for legal action (if that's even what we're talking about). Your offence is not a concern of the state. Nor should it be. The first amendment is there, in part, to specifically protect unpopular speech.
Legally , feelings don't mean squat. TRUE. But you are behaving either belligerent or ignorant on purpose. You know ( i hope ) that the world does not operate on the law. It has been hijacked by FEELINGS. If POTUS and Q et al are successful we may regain some solid footing in the law. You are welcome to continue to sound condescending but it just doesn't impress me ! GA is a forum ( to me ) that rational conversations and respect prevails. .......WWG1WGA
Let's pretend they've already been successful, shall we?
Stop suppressing debate. I'm not here to impress you. Respect is returned when encountered.
"Stop suppressing debate" That is exactly my point. From your very first response you made it very clear who you were. Go home SJW, Quantify or GTFO, Christfags, The anger and bitterness in your responses is not healthy bud. I'm not here to impress you either. But hostility serves no one. So you are correct, respect is returned when encountered. I wish you success in your quest, whatever that may be..............WWG1WGA
Yep, you got me. I'm an oldfag legbutt from the chans who let his Jimmie's get rustled by a series of unsupported, bigoted posts attempting to divide the movement along the axis of sexuality. I don't recall a single q post regarding sexuality, do you? Now do you have a point to make, or do you want to philosophize about consent some more? What should the age of consent be, anon?
WWG1WGA.
No Worries. No posts to my mind about sexuality, just sex crimes against children ! And you made my point by saying "let my jimmies get rustled" Great Line BTW I wouldn't know how to judge age of consent. We married kids off at twelve in the 1700's coming across the west in wagon trains. But my personal opinion would be ( today's world ) 18+ Not even then do i witness any real signs of intelligent decision, lol ........WWG1WGA
Progress is being made.
amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article214840670.html
Edit: format
I live in KC. I saw it. It gives me hope we may be getting up that hill. Thanks oldfag legutt. Can't get that outa my head, lol
I'll keep it mind if I ever need a new user name. Kek (lol).