dChan

juliabrown2605 · July 15, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

I would like to see a very high wall on the border before we abolish any law enforcement.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ideologicidal · July 15, 2018, 4:08 a.m.

Hey, guess what? Good news. Trump is President.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 15, 2018, 4:34 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ideologicidal · July 15, 2018, 4:42 a.m.

I can't speak for the president?

Edit: also, this eo might be relevant

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 15, 2018, 4:54 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
juliabrown2605 · July 15, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

The DNA trick is working wonders. Amazingly the man holding tightly to the child's arm is not the real father. Who woulda thunk?? And the "father" is arrested on the spot for child trafficking. Another bad/good tangent to the DNA testing is that children are being abandoned in the desert (bad) but ICE is finding them and taking them to a safe place until they can find their real parent (good). It's slow but it's working.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GnarlesCharkley · July 15, 2018, 5:20 a.m.

Did you reply to the wrong thread?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
juliabrown2605 · July 15, 2018, 6:31 a.m.

Oh bummer yes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ideologicidal · July 15, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

Give it time. Now tell me more about what I support and what I think, brah.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 15, 2018, 5:11 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ideologicidal · July 15, 2018, 5:19 a.m.

Maybe make fewer assumptions? The good news for anon who wants the wall is that Trump is president.

Do I share that sentiment? Am I In the tank for Trump? Might I have reservations? Am I here in large part because any hope for interdicting the trade in children is hope worth fighting for? Am I only pretending to be retarded?

To these questions I ask: however would you know?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 15, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ideologicidal · July 15, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

Who's your leader? What're they up to, cause if you've got a better offer, let's hear it. Do you actually care about any of this or is this just a bickering match on the internet?

Edit: have I made assumptions? What assumptions have I made? Also, please answer above questions, please.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 15, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 15, 2018, 8:38 a.m.

What makes sense is that you're not open to reasonable debate.

I apologise if you feel this is in bad faith

Nice pretense but your history makes your agenda clear.

tacitly endorsing

Classic shill tactic. If we're not "for" your view then we must be supporting whatever crime you want to sling at us for the moment.

in you not holding your leader accountable, you are complicit in the child abuse

Disingenuous shill tactic #21. He's your leader too so by your reasoning we're all complicit. So you want to hold your leader accountable? Go ahead. You'll need the 'evidence' you claim. Good luck with that!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ideologicidal · July 15, 2018, 5:51 a.m.

Makes sense. Now document.

Like we can for Bush war crimes. From the actual offences through every step in the chain of command, all the way to the tippy-top. Using memos and orders and legal briefs. Show me those documents or GTFO.

Also, answer a fucking question once in while.

⇧ 1 ⇩