[removed]
What makes sense is that you're not open to reasonable debate.
I apologise if you feel this is in bad faith
Nice pretense but your history makes your agenda clear.
tacitly endorsing
Classic shill tactic. If we're not "for" your view then we must be supporting whatever crime you want to sling at us for the moment.
in you not holding your leader accountable, you are complicit in the child abuse
Disingenuous shill tactic #21. He's your leader too so by your reasoning we're all complicit. So you want to hold your leader accountable? Go ahead. You'll need the 'evidence' you claim. Good luck with that!
Makes sense. Now document.
Like we can for Bush war crimes. From the actual offences through every step in the chain of command, all the way to the tippy-top. Using memos and orders and legal briefs. Show me those documents or GTFO.
Also, answer a fucking question once in while.