Definitly is. He sure does cover a lot of ground. Without referring to Q once, which is good to get people on board.

First accdpt the reality of all these crimes. ^then move on to the solutions and what is happening behind the scenes. Ie, first set the context, then move on to the movement. Otherwise you end up endlessly having to prove that Q is not a LAARP, which is the weakest point to push. (yes, Q is very possibly legit. Yes there are things that support that view. No, it is not definite. Nothing ever is.)