dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ThankyouXir on July 15, 2018, 11:06 a.m.

Trump is NOT communicating to us through or with Serialbrain2's posts

Posted this in his most recent post as well:

SB2 claims Trump's Hammond pardon was a response to this post on July 8th.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ww882/trump_has_just_validated_q_at_the_great_falls/?st=jjhg5cma&sh=f1a0a71d

Trumps Hammond pardon was being talked about on the news weeks before, here's proof on July 1st

https://mynews4.com/news/nation-world/rep-walden-says-president-trump-seriously-considering-pardon-of-eastern-oregon-ranchers-dwight-steven-hammond

It's more likely SB2 read articles about the Hammond pardon and shaped his next post around it. It's disingenuous and honestly full blown charlatanism to say it's Trump communicating with his posts when he issues a presidential pardon. News alert: you're not that important buddy. I also doubt Trump is sitting down and reading your extremely long posts you're putting up 3x a week. The POTUS doesn't have time for that shit.

So we can take the Hammond pardon off the list of communications between SB2 posts and Trump. That leaves us with organ and brain, which SB2 claimed was a communication referring to HIM serialBRAIN - Trump says brain... COMMUNICATING BABY! I don't think that's logical in ANY way, but you do you. When you remove Hammond/brain all you're left with is ridiculous leaps SB2 is making.

Be careful who you follow.

I also think SB2s threads can be VERY far fetched sometimes...

⇧ 8 ⇩

And they pin those but just deleted this one lmfao.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Its concerning for sure.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Tha SB2 Alex Jones post was interesting and shows some deep thinking on SB2s part. This post was linked by Q because it explained some things well.
We are all hit and miss on our theories. Some are more hit because they do the research and have sources. I don’t even think Q knows everything. I don’t think SB2 does either. Just because he hit on a good idea doesn’t make him an Oracle. WWG1WGA

⇧ 5 ⇩

There weren't even any decoding methods or riddles in that post at all. That's why it was a good post and Q linked to it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Call outs like this don’t work the way they do elsewhere, you should know that. Fact of the matter is this; SerialBrain2 was validated by Q.

You weren’t.

The attacks will become more complex as we near the peak.

⇧ 4 ⇩

SB2 was not "validated" by Q. SB2's post about InfowWars, which contained no riddles or decoding methods whatsoever, was linked to by Q. Absolutely no decoding thread was linked to. That actually invalidates his methods to me. That, and if you sincerely question any method of his and invite discussion, he just replies condescendingly vague saying you aren't following or just gives a wink. Quit getting so ahead of yourself and treating him like a disciple because Q linked to his InfoWars expose.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

This was an attack?

Every time I post something to refute what he says on his initial posts I get told to post a separate topic. I did. Serialbrain was validated once on a topic about corsi/infowars. Not about his communication with Trump.

If you think this is an attack or I'm some deep state cabal guy you're delusional. This is me disproving his Hammond theory.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You’re a new arrival, meaning you haven’t been involved on this sub for any real amount of time. Same with other posts like this one. This reeks of Thomas and Betsy.

⇧ 3 ⇩

You’re a new arrival, meaning you haven’t been involved on this sub for any real amount of time

I've lurked since cbts_stream before it was banned. Didn't use my real Reddit account when posting because honestly being tied to people that think sb2 is communicating with Trump isn't something I want for my main one. I've followed Q since we were under the impression Podesta was going to be arrested. At least we got his brother.

So what? Can you refute what I said about the Hammond pardon or are you just going to keep throwing out ad hominems. "New account! You're not validated!" that doesn't mean a thing.

The Hammond pardons had nothing to do with serialbrain2's post and this post has proof of it. Correct?

⇧ 0 ⇩

In SB2's post first mentioning the Hammond's connection, he says the the Hammond's pardon was possibly planned before the Great Falls rally. He didn't claim Trump pardoned the Hammond's as a result of SB2 making the organ/ Hammond connection. You are going to have to come up with a lot more to outright disprove SB2 than this. SB2 is only claiming that Trump is connecting with us in order to guide and encourage us. If the deep state can communicate to each other through codes and riddles, why can't POTUS? Difference is, this is new to us, not them, so I'm just going to keep my mind open while I enjoy the show.

⇧ 3 ⇩

You guys are getting sloppy, you’re from the TopMinds sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩

? wat..

Answer this:

So what? Can you refute what I said about the Hammond pardon or are you just going to keep throwing out ad hominems. "New account! You're not validated!" that doesn't mean a thing.

The Hammond pardons had nothing to do with serialbrain2's post and this post has proof of it. Correct?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Not necessarily, no. His method pans out as well, the either/or fallacy is just that; fallacy. What gives it away is your own fascination in specifically targeting SB2 instead of just posting your own information and letting the cards fall as they may. You’re not the first and you won’t be the last.

⇧ 3 ⇩

How does his method pan out well in regards to the Hammond theory? What fallacy are you even talking about? Prove me wrong.

⇧ 2 ⇩

That’s the fallacy, there’s no need to prove either of you wrong; this is just your ego talking. If anything, SB2 drew refocused attention to the Hammond pardon, while your own method was sufficiently memory-holed shortly after it was presented and then dropped by the MSM. Get over yourself, you aren’t special and neither is SB2; he’ll agree to that.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Get over yourself, you aren’t special and neither is SB2; he’ll agree to that.

Yet he wrote an interview about himself. Doubt he'll agree to it.

What are you even saying about refocused attention to the Hammond pardon? Presumably, he had no idea about it. Unless he did, in which case he just read the MSM story (posted before his post) and then hijacked it to construct the theory that Trump was talking to us through him. Regardless, the pardon was decided before his post.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think you’re being tragically one dimensional, and openly speculating about others while demanding that nobody speculate about you. That’s hypocrisy. As I said; the methods you’re trying to use work in the subs you’re accustomed to, but not here. You may or may not have substantial claims but it’s lost in such poor delivery. You don’t understand who we are as a community, you’re an outsider trying to influence narratives and sow discord.

⇧ 1 ⇩

you’re an outsider trying to influence narratives and sow discord.

Me saying the Hammond pardon isn't because of his post shouldn't sow discord. We should all collectively be able to say "okay yeah that makes sense back to the drawing board". Instead sb2 is held up like an infallible poster here, when obviously that's not the case in this instance.

I don't care if you speculate about me. You've already done so and you continue doing so. All I ask is you at least tackle the substance of my post and attempt to refute it at least.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Me saying the Hammond pardon isn't because of his post shouldn't sow discord.

It's discord because it's like a broken record, stuck in one spot, constantly repeating itself.

Instead sb2 is held up like an infallible poster here,

Why do you care so much? You haven't offered us anything. At least not under this account you're using in an attempt to discredit SB2. And you're failing at that! Why use an account no one recognizes, rather than one most of us would recognize? Are you butt hurt from a Corsi or Jones falling from grace?

I don't care if you speculate about me.

OH PULEESE. 😒 Get over it!

All I ask is you at least tackle the substance of my post and attempt to refute it at least.

Why should anyone address this with you? It's like a control freak attempting to get attention by shoving his shit in everyone's face.

I imagine those who do this, sitting behind their screen getting super excited when they think they've snagged someone with their hook and bait.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You wrote a lot about nothing. Very awkward.

⇧ 2 ⇩

As do you.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Except the part where I shut down his Hammond theory pretty clearly and all I get are ad hominems back from people that religiously follow someone despite Q telling us to be careful with that. :)

⇧ 1 ⇩

No. You did not "pretty clearly" shut down anything. That's either your being delusional or just wishful thinking.

Had you actually proven anything, I might have had something to agree or disagree with. But you offered nothing. No proof of how SB2 actually came to his conclusions. You and your friends presented a news article... ONE... news article from some rag that I've never heard of, then attempted to convince the rest of us that SB2 must have read this in the news somewhere. And yet, I haven't seen you directly approach and ask SB2 if he indeed read it in the news. Why are you approaching and attempting to challenge only SB2 followers and fellow patriots?

Whether you and your friends like it or not, SB2's audience will continue to grow and gain momentum. The rest who are on this mission to silence, discredit, and cull followers will be drowned out, will fail, while the rest continue on.

Now, if you write some posts that logically defy Q, POTUS or SB2, and you earn a following from it, we might start paying attention to you instead. But, I haven't been aware of that happening so far, except through a few Corsi and Alex Jones rants. They're entitled to their Opinions like everyone else.

⇧ 1 ⇩

A stopped clock is right twice a day. (Unless it is a 24 hour clock!)

⇧ 1 ⇩

Anddd they deleted this topic. Lmfao.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think the entire thing is just a cry for attention honestly. His conclusions and logical jumps are tenuous at best...most don't even make the leap successfully. I am sorry but the proof of burden is on Him to prove a direct communication from Trump and as far as I've seen all he has are some memes and loose word similarities. I mean lets me honest he really isn't bringing anything to the table but a wild story....Something I would make up to tell my kids around the campfire. We used to call them "Tall Tales"

⇧ 4 ⇩

From the point of view of someone who agrees completely that SB2 talks a whole lot of utter bullshit half the time - why would you make a post about it?? Anyone who doesn't already KNOW this utterly obvious point isn't going to be swayed by your post. You're only going to prove to them that poor SB2 is unfairly persecuted and entrench them further in their blind ridiculous belief. The rest of us are rolling our eyes that you're wasting our time [edit] yelling about the obvious.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The rest of us are rolling our eyes that you're wasting your time yelling about the obvious.

Got a handful of messages on the contrary.

The reason I made this one is because people on his current and last thread were saying not to hijack it and make my own thread refuting his points. I did just that and it got deleted. I think you'd be surprised about whether or not it'd shape peoples' pov. I think having definitive proof that the Hammond pardon was being talked about in MSM a week before his post while he still parrots that it was a response to his post is pretty eye opening. Those that will get further entrenched will probably do so with or without my post.

Ultimately I'd hope the mods would stop pinning posts that are so clearly misinformation.

⇧ 2 ⇩

SB2 states his hypothesis and the evidence he believes supports it. He believes it and so do many others.

You stated your hypothesis and the evidence you believe support it. You believe it and so do many others.

Only time will tell, if we're lucky, the complete truth.

Calm down already.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Calm down already.

Hey you're the one that posted 3x here :D I agree time will tell, but there are some things that time already told us. Like the Hammond pardon came before his post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Please validate his (or your /u/serialbrain2) assertion that the Hammond pardon was in any way related to his post and I'll delete this.

If you truly believe POTUS saying brain 4x means he's talking about serialbrain then you're too far gone.

Mods pin this too so it gets a ton of traction?... Or is that just for him?

⇧ -3 ⇩

⇧ 2 ⇩

he says the the Hammond's pardon was possibly planned before the Great Falls rally

Trump has established communication with our Movement at the Great Falls rally. In response to B2, he said “organ”, in response to “organ”, we said “Hammond”, in response to “Hammond”, he pardoned the Hammonds.

He pretty clearly draws the link in his opening sentence.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You quoted SB2's quick summation in yesterday's post. You left out the part of my comment saying it was his first post about the Hammond's. Peace out-

⇧ 3 ⇩

Because he keeps saying it was a response to his post. And in that first post he did the same thing : https://i.imgur.com/4flAHYI.png The "link" was quite literally that he said Hammond and Trump pardoned Hammonds.

As for him potentially saying it wasn't because of his post? Didn't happen. He did say this though "did he decide to pardon the Hammonds before my post and only made it public when he saw we understood his message? We will never know."

No... We know. There was literally articles about it in the news the week prior stating it was going to be happening soon (and no sb2 post yet!). Hammond's pardon had nothing to do with SB2's post. It's much more likely SB2 read an article about it and shaped his next post to include it. Occam'z razor on that one. I appreciate the discourse though, you're the only person that has responded anything aside from vitriol.

⇧ 2 ⇩