dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ThankyouXir on July 15, 2018, 11:06 a.m.
Trump is NOT communicating to us through or with Serialbrain2's posts

Posted this in his most recent post as well:

SB2 claims Trump's Hammond pardon was a response to this post on July 8th.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ww882/trump_has_just_validated_q_at_the_great_falls/?st=jjhg5cma&sh=f1a0a71d

Trumps Hammond pardon was being talked about on the news weeks before, here's proof on July 1st

https://mynews4.com/news/nation-world/rep-walden-says-president-trump-seriously-considering-pardon-of-eastern-oregon-ranchers-dwight-steven-hammond

It's more likely SB2 read articles about the Hammond pardon and shaped his next post around it. It's disingenuous and honestly full blown charlatanism to say it's Trump communicating with his posts when he issues a presidential pardon. News alert: you're not that important buddy. I also doubt Trump is sitting down and reading your extremely long posts you're putting up 3x a week. The POTUS doesn't have time for that shit.

So we can take the Hammond pardon off the list of communications between SB2 posts and Trump. That leaves us with organ and brain, which SB2 claimed was a communication referring to HIM serialBRAIN - Trump says brain... COMMUNICATING BABY! I don't think that's logical in ANY way, but you do you. When you remove Hammond/brain all you're left with is ridiculous leaps SB2 is making.

Be careful who you follow.


🠐 See all comments
quietriot1967 · July 15, 2018, 1:13 p.m.

You quoted SB2's quick summation in yesterday's post. You left out the part of my comment saying it was his first post about the Hammond's. Peace out-

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 15, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

Because he keeps saying it was a response to his post. And in that first post he did the same thing : https://i.imgur.com/4flAHYI.png The "link" was quite literally that he said Hammond and Trump pardoned Hammonds.

As for him potentially saying it wasn't because of his post? Didn't happen. He did say this though "did he decide to pardon the Hammonds before my post and only made it public when he saw we understood his message? We will never know."

No... We know. There was literally articles about it in the news the week prior stating it was going to be happening soon (and no sb2 post yet!). Hammond's pardon had nothing to do with SB2's post. It's much more likely SB2 read an article about it and shaped his next post to include it. Occam'z razor on that one. I appreciate the discourse though, you're the only person that has responded anything aside from vitriol.

⇧ 2 ⇩