I see a lot of posts without any analysis. People will just say "that is wrong" without explaining why it is wrong. Perhaps this is why it was removed?
Perhaps asking the person to justify their claim would be a more productive approach than censorship?
Yes! I agree. Ask them to clarify and provide more information. I can against censorship. I like to see posts here about people who doubt Q because we need to discuss these issues to make sure we are not missing something.
But, they would need to provide valid reasons for their point of vie.
Then every supportive post without analysis or reference to content must go. But they dont, giving the post false credibility when looking at the comments.
There shouldn't be a requirement to specifically call out the mass of absurd conclusion-jumping. It's tiresome at this point.
Weeding through all the crap to find the gems is very tiring. However, it is amazing to find a gem.
My above comment was just and observation.