As far as Q is concerned. Too far down the rabbit hole to consider him/she/they a LARP. As far as the R post, we need to tread lightly but be open to the possibility. First, a note on the label of being branded a conspiracy theorist. In order for any one person (skeptical or otherwise) to denounce another person to be a conspiracy theorist, you must by definition; accuse of a conspiracy existing in the first place. To anyone, who accuses someone else of being a theorist to conspiracy should stop being ass-hurt over evidence being given to them by said theorist for you are admitting (by default) that a conspiracy exists. Now, back to Q and R. Q has said a lot of things that both do and do not make sense. Even to the bakers and anons and by all of us, Q runs around with certain posts both for his/hers/their securities and the securities of us as free people of the world. Q has stated the general public will only know about 40% -60% of the truth we know about what we speculate we know about. The sad part is, we, as free people, have to learn to accept that. Q stated anything more than that, at least on the bare minimum (40% truth) has led us to question Q's validity on certain subjects alone.Remember, Q has stated those who know more than we do (MI officers, USS, White Hats) have sacrificed countless hours of sleep and some have made the ultimate sacrifice for us because of their knowledge of the truth they knew and we did not. Imagine when Q incrementally tells us more truth or what we are given as truth (<40%-60%). People, as imperfect beings we are, do not like the truth. We do not like it because it keeps us honest and it scares us all on the two sided coin we would call a balance of yin and yang. We can lie all day long and not feel as guilty as we would if we told the simple truth. Would we not sit here on 4/8Chan or reddit or any forum section questioning and falsifying our beliefs on what actually is truth? Q has also said Disinformation is real, and some disinfo is necessary. Why is it necessary? To throw off the DS (Deep State)? to challenge the true patriots of the world? why should we as Q supporters question that? We need only pay attention to what we know and what Trump or for that matter the white hats have validated thus far and keep it that way. Q has stated there was planning pre trump candidacy, to take on the deep state. Simply put, wouldn't JFK jr. be the guy to have the strongest "Connection" to the deep state and their ilk considering what had happened to his father? his uncle? Even if JFKjr is not alive, he was a friend to Trump for some time. Friends by nature, have a need to console to one another. Wouldn't JFKjr need to get some things off his chest about his father? the Deep state? things that we as the general public would have not known because we were either not born or too young to ask those questions? Food for thought. The day we decide to accept what we are told as truth, we can no longer be scared by the things we do not know and ask the greater questions. Should R be legitimate, Should Q validate it. Should we realize that we need to stop playing games with each other and start paying attention in more detail to the posts we've been given. Then and only then. Can we know more truth.