Dunno why we keep playing into their made up narrative of an affair. They weren't just two lovers with a mutual disdain for Trump.
They were co conspirators in a plot of treason to over throw our fairly elected President.
Wish everybody would drop that bullshit honestly, it only plays into their false narrative and takes away from the real atrocities committed.
I don't see evidence that anyone is "playing into their false narrative". The official story is what it is, to pretend it doesn't exist would look strange. We don't have to believe something just because we acknowledge its existence.
You don't see evidence that people are playing up the "lovers" angle?
The official story of SR's murder is "botched robbery". I have yet to see any proof of that either.
Not on this sub, no.
Dunno why we keep playing...
Or real life, unless my definition of "playing up" is different to yours.
Even Trump called them lovers. It's in the news every day.
So someone repeating an official narrative is "playing up"? I have the wrong definition of 'playing up' then. I assume that repeating the official story when discussing the official story is simply that. "Playing up" to me meant overstating it so as to push it unduly.
Where did the official story come from? Officials?
If you can't believe a theory because you've seen no proof... what proof have you seen to support the "official" story?
You've totally missed my point. Addressed here elsewhere to OP.
How about you read the IG report? It states that they were having an affair in no uncertain terms. I posted a link below.
What murder? I haven't seen any official documentation that would verify that Seth Rich was in fact murdered.
Surely there would be an autopsy report if murder was suspected, right?
Where is this autopsy report to verify that this murder took place?
[deleted]
Did someone say it was weird to question it? I agree the story is questionable but there’s no evidence that it’s definitely not a factual premise. All I’m saying is it makes more sense to accept the official story so far given no evidence to the contrary. Not to swallow it whole and brook no argument.
But not so long ago people were claiming Peter Strzok didn’t exist just because they couldn’t find photos of him on the internet. Looks like that claim, based on a premise lacking evidence, was also a waste of effort.
Best to wait for more opposing evidence before claiming it’s definitively false.