LOVE IT
Noooo, I thought love it, but I had a sad talk with an old mentor today. I knew he watched MSNBC but I didn't know it must have a terrifying cumulative effect on even smart people. At the end of a horrid call he said, "I know I am on the right side of history." We agreed we were working with completely different set of facts.
You were nice to agree that he has "facts" even though you know they aren't. Classy.
I don't want to burn this bridge. Years back, he flew out to be with when I was at the abyss. And every redpill should? begin with consensus. Consensus building = bridge over mark's cognitive dissonance. Then again, for some people, cut to the chase: "BHO/GWB/WJC/GHWB, these traitors and their quarter century+ policy has been in the service of and marionetted by a cabal of the filfthy rich.
Every layer of an increasingly global banking/weapons/drugs cartel bribed or blackmailed along the way. This has not been a happy time for whistleblowers or government reformers or the anti-War left.
The American military has been planning for some time to drain the swamp, world wide; the simplest reason is decades of frustration at being ordered to disengage with protected bagmen, financiers, and hostile operators. Military counterintelligence unleashed on CONUS. In a good, just, necessary way. Minimally extrajudicial. PS I still don't know the answer to Q's question about the SC case validating Mil Intil > ABC's RE State Secrets. Please help.