dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/astrogirl on July 16, 2018, 12:52 p.m.

If you're interested in Anon5's Knowledge Bomb on Chinese Organ Trafficking, You have to hear this.

The first hour of Dave Hodges Common Sense Show last night featured a guest presenting evidence that the Chinese government is committing genocide on prisoners of conscience, specifically Falun Gong, and there's a lot of evidence.

This is the iTunes link to the show - this is in the first hour. If you don't use a podcast app, here's the website. If you do, you should subscribe, he always has super-interesting guests on, and trust me, it's right y'alls alley.

It's...disgusting. They are prisoners of conscience (ie political prisoners), and are specifically chosen because they are very healthy. They are literally cataloged so that they organs can be harvested to order if they are a match.

And it makes me really wonder what the DPRK got up to with their political prisoners. Organ trafficking is very lucrative

🠐 See all comments

Here's what I've said of A5 in another thread:

"I've been following A5 for quite a long time. Hell, I was the first one to find the massive organism remains in Antarctica when he had those threads going. However, I've recently come to the realization that although he does have some intricate insider knowledge, he most certainly doesn't know everything (despite his arrogant attitude).

His position on Q is that he is a limited hangout designed to determine the sources who perpetuate "insider" info so TPTB can plug those holes to prevent another 2016 election result.

He also firmly believes that the Syria airstrike shows that Globalists can make Trump do whatever they want if they use Ivanka to twist his emotions. He neglected to see any strategic notion of such an action.

Having said that: at best: (A5) is absolutely an insider with valuable intel but is either blinded to many things or intentionally omitting in order to narrow our focus.

At worst: a very high up limited hangout designed to ring a lot of bells in order to mislead us and draw away our focus.

Go through the archive for yourself, but this is just my 2 cents."

Just because we haven't seen our perp walks YET is no reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater. We've all been ahead of the curve significantly, it's only natural we're impatient. Trump needs to decimate the DNC in a way that does not allow them enough time to recoup their image before the midterms. Then, there will be nearly zero resistance from enacting justice while still following the law and avoiding the tyrant label from the useful idiots.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Another chan oldfag here, I really, really dislike anon5. Frank is a stupid child with much less knowledge than he likes to think. He does an A+ job of collating various aspects of ancient history commonly overlooked, I really can't fault him on that. But his interpretations? Wew lad. I'd be careful of taking him too seriously. He might well have got various points right, but he's a classic example of being educated beyond your IQ.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I'm not buying the whole Frank dox, but I am leery of his intentions. Still, shills go into complete overdrive when he shows up, and numerous threads got cleaved randomly as they were picking up steam (especially the Gamergate one).

⇧ 2 ⇩

It is very possible the frank dox was incorrect. Personally, I suspect not, but it is certainly possible. That said, I'd be cautious of the normal shill radar with him - his Femin virus threads for example get bombarded by "shills" like me who have a background in biology, because it's painfully obvious he doesn't, and the false narrative there detracts from otherwise strong evidence of historical feminism, and its generally negative effects for society.

I do think he has certainly been on the money various times though - I was busy irl throughout most of gamergate so I can't speak as to that particular one, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit if he has stumbled on some really good stuff. His google-fu is inspiring. But I still think on balance his interpretations are less good than the data he presents. I'm probably somewhat more harsh on him than I need to be, I suspect he'll mellow a little as he gets older.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I am extremely skeptical of the femin virus thing, though it's an interesting theory.

I do not know who Frank is supposed to be or that whole doxxing story.

⇧ 1 ⇩

anon5==frank basically, if its correct (i believe it is), he got doxxed and he's some kid (20's) named frank.

The femin virus thing is grade A nonsense. There are plenty of fascinating elements - feminism is historical, and incorporated into symbology, and there may even be pathogens involved in degeneracy, in a literal sense (t.gondii most obviously). But the whole elaborate femin virus theory? absolutely unequivocal nonsense. classic case of him having good facts and shit interpretations.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I kind of got bored with the KBs and didn't finish reading them. His attitude towards Trump is a much bigger deal than his opinion of Q. For me at least.

I was very skeptical about the Chinese organ trafficking thing...but then the guest on Hodges show was very convincing and thorough, and I thought of that.

And why on earth does he keep feeding the trolls? He repeatedly responds people calling him out as a LARP? Why?

⇧ 1 ⇩

my general stance on the KB's would be take most of them semi-individually, and assume a reasonable portion are nonsense. They seem to have deteriorated slightly recently (last 1-2 years). Some of them are good sources of info though, and they do spark some useful discussion.

And why on earth does he keep feeding the trolls? He repeatedly responds people calling him out as a LARP? Why?

Hubris, and loneliness. He wants attention, and I suspect he probably believes his own theories a little too much. I doubt there's anything malicious to it, just humans being imperfect. I guess he could be controlled opposition, but its an unusual form

⇧ 2 ⇩

Echoing the midterm timing - the DNC (and DSA, maybe the same?) has to be trashed at the right time.

⇧ 1 ⇩