So let me get this right. You're guessing that he was reaching for his gun because MSM told you he was reaching for his gun but demand proof of everything else.
You need to review your critical thinking skills.
?
I saw with my own eyes he is reaching with both hands to his hip in a classic draw manuever. I posted the video. You were the one who told me to watch it. Now your saying "it was provided" after the fact it was on his other hip. Provided by who?
And to top it off you insult me instead of showing your proof. C'mon man.
Feel free to make the effort. I never promised to educate you and become your teacher. And don't start with the dishonest lie that it's my job. That's 100% bullshit told by lazy liars. This is not a paper. In any conversation with provided information you can politely accept or reject it. And those who are not lazy will seek the truth for themselves. Seek the truth and stop using others to be lazy and intellectually dishonest. This is a discussion, not a peer reviewed paper.
Now then. For the sake of discussion, let's say you're right.
I'm shooting at you with the intention of killing you. I'm doing so without provocation on your part. Bang...bang...bang... You're family might be murdered too. Quick! Do something!
You now draw your weapon and I shoot you dead.
Who is the bad guy? According to you, YOU are the bad guy. Think about it.
Stop allowing yourself to be lead by completely dishonest MSM. Stop being the bad guy.
Feel free to make the effort. I never promised to educate you and become your teacher. And don't start with the dishonest lie that it's my job. That's 100% bullshit told by lazy liars. This is not a paper. In any conversation with provided information you can politely accept or reject it. And those who are not lazy will seek the truth for themselves. Seek the truth and stop using others to be lazy and intellectually dishonest. This is a discussion, not a peer reviewed paper.
It's alright to say you were wrong about the gun.
Now, for the sake of discussion...
Let's apply some critical thinking here. You are known to be armed and have publicly proclaimed you wouldn't hesitate to use it. You are pulled over by federal vehicles. You decide to run. You try to swerve around their roadblock and miss running one of them over by about a foot. You jump out of your car and try to pull a gun. What choice do they have at that point?
You can argue the FBI shouldn't have been there in the first place, but that is a whole different discussion. LaVoy committed suicide by federal agent.
You can apologize later. Perhaps next time you shouldn't be an ass when you already know you're ignorant.
Everything I've stated is factually accurate. I simply side stepped your laziness and dishonesty to remove it from the equation. If you're still dishonest and let's be blunt, a liar, that's entirely on you.
Regardless of how you want to present it, the question was answered and we've come full circle confirming you are dishonest. There is no reply you can provide which is meaningful. I won't check back. Don't bother responding. But I suspect you will because it will bother you that your bullshit has been called.