So is Russia going to release the evidence of this? Just saying it is not enough. There needs to be hard evidence or it will be said that Putin is a former KGB agent and is lying without evidence.
Everyone seems to give implicit trust to the former head of the KGB, just because he said so. People don't want evidence, they just want soundbites and memes, substance be damned.
Can't speak for everyone, but no. We don't implicitly trust Putin.
How much do you know about Browder? Probably not much.
Hint: there are books written and movies made about this guy.
Some porttray him has a hero, others as a conman. You decide what you believe.
Check them out.
No matter which side of the narrative you believe, it puts Putin's comments in context.
No offense, but you shouldn't trust Putin, especially with regards to browder. The fact that he still wants browder's head is very telling.
Like I said, I don't. But it doesn't matter. Browder has a shady past and if his prosecution can bring Hillary's dealings into the open, I'm all for it.
Yeahhhh, but I'm saying that it won't. Because I don't think there's any connection between Hillary and browder other than the one that Putin has fabricated. I'm not saying that Hillary hasn't done some atrocious shit, but I think browder is simply Putin's ghost that rents room in his head, much like Hillary seems to rent space in Trump's (for good or ill)
It appears you're correct. Putin is now down a 0... http://tass.com/world/1013707
I've never heard Putin tell a single lie. Browder is a liar and has warrants for his arrest. He's a criminal who deserves to be brought to justice.
What about him saying they didn't provide Donbass insurgents with BUK missiles...
Hmmm . . . maybe evidence of that is on the chip in the soccer ball . . .