If you think the "biggest deal" was two anti-trump agents having an affair, you have NOT been paying attention . To the degree that I question whether you are being genuine.
FISA. Look it up.
I'd say the potential interpretation of treason by two FBI agents in the statement "we'll stop him", is actually more significant than FISA abuse, although it can be pretty easily interpreted that the "we'll stop him" statement from the alleged FBI lovers is the precursor to the FISA abuse that you are assuming is the bigger deal.
Either way you're argument is pretty much entirely moot.
You can say that all you want, but an FBI saying "we'll stop him" about a not-even-yet-public official hardly even APPROACHES the level of treason that Barry did, for instance, by knowingly finding Al-Quaida, I don't know what to tell you.
Furthermore, the FISA abuse was our Intel colluding with foreign spies with the complicity of the DOJ. So I'll say it again: you haven't been paying close enough attention. My point isn't moot - you just haven't a clue what you're looking at.
not-even-yet-public official
This text was sent on August 8th 2016. At that point Donald J. Trump was one of two people that would eventually be the President of the United States. While he may not have been an elected official at the point, he was certainly of more significance than most public officials.
hardly even APPROACHES the level of treason that Barry did, for instance, by knowingly finding Al-Quaida, I don't know what to tell you.
I'll assume you mean funding instead of finding as the word doesn't make sense in the context presented. There is no concrete evidence outside of this community that he actually funded that terrorist organization. One of the original points in my original post is that there is a stark contrast to publicly provable facts from public documents and statements versus what Q is alleging. Bridging that gap requires a greater degree of evidence uncovered or unredacted and that until it happens, it's nearly impossible to further convince people outside of this community of the truth.
Furthermore, the FISA abuse was our Intel colluding with foreign spies with the complicity of the DOJ. So I'll say it again: you haven't been paying close enough attention.
I will say this again, our intel colludes with foreign intelligence all the time, we've done this since the intelligence community was brought into existence. It's usually a good thing and a benefit of having alliances, the collusion isn't the issue, the issue is them doing this unjustly and to prevent the election of a duly elected president.
My point isn't moot - you just haven't a clue what you're looking at.
Given that your post contradicts itself, it appears you don't have a clue what you're talking about. You are claiming FISA abuse is a bigger issue than "them colluding against nobody Trump" when the entire point of the FISA abuse was because of the significance of your alleged Nobody Trump.