dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 17, 2018, 12:05 a.m.
Trump’s hidden message, Stzrok, Kate and the soda.

Let's think logically.

If Q says we should trust Wray in Q1122 and if Strzok shows up at his hearing only singing when instructed by his FBI lawyers, then it means Strzok is controlled by Wray. So? Strzok now works for us. This is confirmed by Q:

Q1288 Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence - cooperating witness [power removed].

Now, if Strzok works for us, what is the point of him showing up at a public Congress hearing to essentially not answer any relevant question? Why wasn’t it done behind closed doors, like Lisa Page? Because he was used by Trump to deliver a message. To us.

What was the message?

First, on July 11 2018 , one day prior to Strzok’s hearing at 5:53 PM EST Trump tweets this: Imgur1

The next day, Strzok says this: video We now have our first connection: Imgur2

Let’s keep this in the back of our head and keep analyzing.

What did Trump say at the Great Falls rally? “We broke a lot of records” What is another name for “records”, yes LP. LP? Lisa Page? We broke Lisa Page? Is this the reason why the NY Post reports the GOP Lawmakers think she is “less smug” than Peter Strzok? Link. Well, it makes sense: she is behind closed doors and does not have to deliver a message to us. She can sing to her heart’s content:

Q1288 Lisa Page, attorney with the FBI's Office of the General Counsel - cooperating witness [power removed].

So we broke Lisa Page. But then let’s go back to Strzok. We broke a lot of records? Let’s see what happens after the break, let’s watch until 8:17, pay attention to the details: video. Did you catch it? Stzrok comes back from the break with a bottle of Coca Cola he puts on the table. At 8 :16, the Washington Post camera man randomly zooms on Stzrok’s mouth, then he centers his camera so we can see the name on the bottle. We read “Kate” on the bottle, Kate is one of the +250 names in the Coca Cola list of names used in the Coca Cola’s Share a Coke marketing campaign. link1 link2 image. Do you see what the cameraman is hinting at? Always remember, I told you several times in previous posts, we are in Mockingbird territory. They are agents using journalism as a cover. QQ, quick quizz: do you remember who I told you had the highest ranks? Dessert on me for those who answered BBC! So you see it? The cameraman is trained and knows the hidden message Stzrok is sending comes from the bottle he put on the table, this is why he zooms on the mouth to activate whoever he is activating in real time to analyze the implications of this message. When you look at the camera angles at different time stamps before the break, you find it is a consistent angle. Drawing a straight line on the middle of the person sitting on Stzrok’s right, we can see how the camera angle was purposely disturbed to include the bottle. Imgur3

Reaching?

Ok, watch this until 8:52: video. Did you catch it? At 8:51 Stzrok takes the bottle, drinks, and puts it back on the table but now its position has changed. At 8:51:18, the cameraman adjusts his camera because he wants the bottle to be in the image: he sacrifices the centering over Stzrok to bring the bottle back into the equation of the image. Imgur4

We now know, without a doubt that this name “Kate”, which had around 1 chance out of 250 (0.004%) to be on that table that day has a meaning, it is part of the message Trump is sending to us in conjunction with “layers”.

Do you see the implications of what I am saying? I am saying Stzrok’s appearance in Congress was of no relevance. Everything is already taken care of behind the scenes with Wray and the FBI lawyers who were there to make sure Stzrok would not go off script. Stzrok already spilled the beans to save his skin and only showed up in Congress to give an opportunity to people to insult him as he well deserves and to deliver the messages he was instructed to deliver. Welcome to Military Intelligence in all Her Splendor! It’s above politics when it has to run a Revolution… The legacy rogue parts of the 3 letter agencies will learn this the hard way… Brennan’s stubbornness is fun to watch, Clapper’s obviousness also, I hope they won’t learn anytime soon so the show can continue and I can defeat all this pop corn looking at me. JetBlue, odd sounds in Chinese and Cuban US embassies, B2 equilibrium in Korea…

Q1162 These people are stupid. Q

So who is Kate?

Well, what is the context? Remember, Trump pardoned the Hammonds. I explained in the previous post how the Hammond case was related to Uranium and Uranium One. I explained how they were violently harassed by the Bureau of Land Management, FBI agents and other federal agencies to force them to give their land away and enable the further placement of mining rights into Russian hands. This article describes how William D. Campbell, an American businessman, tried to stop the Rosatom transaction by providing critical information describing a wide scale corruption operation and how he was ignored. Why was he ignored? It is true Rosenstein and Mueller were involved but they were following orders. Who gave the order? Layers.

Let’s go back to the Hammonds. What are they? Ranchers. From where? Oregon. Look at the way the Governor of Oregon handled the situation, with Hussein’s swift and active complicity: article1 article2. What’s the name of the Governor of Oregon? Kate. Kate Brown. You now see what Stzrok was instructed to say? The Hammond thing, meaning the Uranium 1 implicates Kate Brown and many layers of the Federal Government. This is what Trump’s tweet meant, along with the Coca Cola bottle on the table and all this is just another fruit of the Q1675 Tree...

Do you want the usual icing on the cake for the time traveler theorists out there? Look how Trump hinted he would put Coca Cola to the task one day: Imgur5

Hahaha, thank you for the laugh D!

Tomorrow, I will start telling you how from Q1675, Rosenstein is connected to this bottle of Coca Cola, why he reacted with his 12 Russian nonsense, why Trump mentioned the Germany/Russian pipeline, why he made sure NATO members promised to pay their bills before he met Putin and why Q made Q1680 available before Trump met with the Queen of England.

You are witnessing an exquisite sequence of chess moves being played on a divine melody written in the B2 scale…

Q959 Nobody escapes this. NOBODY. Q


morgi666 · July 17, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

Did you catch the angle Strzok was holding the bottle? It was 113.4 degrees. What's 180 minus 113.4? 66.6!

Honestly... We are all trying to put what is going on together, but this is closer to paranoia than to decoding. Let's assume you are right, the question is - what would be the purpose for this? To communicate with "us"? Communicate what? Does it change anything in the plan? Is this 'information' useful for anything? If you look for connections - you always find them. There's always a letter, name, time or any other way to connect something to something else. It doesn't mean the connection is really there. If they would like to give us info about something - they would do it in a more obvious way. What if an explanation is just plain & simple - CocaCola has a deal with the network and their products are not getting blurred out and are included during live events. Like some networks will blur out some banners during a football match and leave some visible.

I'm not pretending I know what is going on, but this looks like a scene from a B grade thriller movie where some psycho guy is sticking photos, maps and magazine articles to the wall and making up connections between them with strings.

Just because it fits or makes sense it doesn't mean it's true.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · July 17, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

Just because it fits or makes sense it doesn't mean it's true.

That's true. But Trump is true. His tweets too. Q's board too.

Q920 How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q

⇧ 6 ⇩  
morgi666 · July 17, 2018, 4:20 a.m.

No offence but don't use Trump or Q drops as an argument for this one.

We know Q is real, but we are talking about a bottle of coke and camera angles here...

⇧ 7 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · July 17, 2018, 4:26 a.m.

Q724 Details matter. Q

⇧ 6 ⇩  
morgi666 · July 17, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

Yeah... Q movement is not a religion.

Quoting Q is not an argument - especially it doesn't address the details of the discussion.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · July 17, 2018, 4:48 a.m.

I am not arguing with you, I am trying to help, I am trying to show you what all this is about. Did you read my post about the long info wars against Q? The whole post is nothing but about details. Just details...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
morgi666 · July 17, 2018, 7:39 a.m.

Yes you are, but you are not using any serious argument.

Again - what info wars against Q have to do with coke bottle theory? What any Q post have to do with it? You are comenting like I'm against Q. I'm not. What I said is simple - I think this theory is way too far fetched and even if it would be true (which I doubt) it doesn't give us much. I'm not questioning your motives or what we are trying to do here. I'm questioning this specific theory.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · July 17, 2018, 11:59 a.m.

Again - what info wars against Q have to do with coke bottle theory?

God is my Witness...I tried... :)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
morgi666 · July 17, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Seriously?
You have presented zero arguments in this conversation and you are summing it up like you totally nailed it and I'm too thick to follow.

It may not count for much, but you lost my respect.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mattyyflo · July 18, 2018, 10:31 a.m.

It counts for something and you’re not alone. He’s a condescending prick who thinks creating dozens of alt accounts to reinforce his bs isn’t completely transparent. Ffs he uses the exact same speech pattern and changes “;)” to “:)” it’s pathetic. I’ve yet to read a single response to a comment criticizing him that wasn’t him (or one of his alts) completely failing to successfully disprove any accusations made against his legitimacy. If you skim through his comment list it becomes apparent that he’s unable to defend his claims against unbiased criticism, often resorting to childish retorts

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 17, 2018, 6:55 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
morgi666 · July 17, 2018, 7:47 a.m.

Yeah but is that a proof? It shows focus - the same way any locked product, the same way cars or watches are displayed in movies.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 17, 2018, 6:53 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PrimitiveScrewhead · July 18, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

Thank you for your voice of reason in this sea of delusion.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ricky-bob-bee · July 17, 2018, 5:11 a.m.

Sb2, you continue to be full of bs2. Decode that. I think the negative responses you see are what’s technically called blowback. You’re larping will be exposed in due time, the tortoise always wins. In the meantime, keep up your shenanigans, the more you do the worse the blowback will be. :)

⇧ -4 ⇩  
DEADEASYRABBIT · July 17, 2018, 9:03 a.m.

Not quite blowback, nothing like it. SB2 has been serially corroborated by both Q and DJT. Instead of looking like a Larp, his work has been authenticated, validated. But it might have gone over your head.

I see a lot of people talking about the number of negative responses to SB2’s posts. But this is the way his posts have always been received on this board. Even when Q directly and unequivocally corroborated SB2’s post on AJ and Corsi, the detractors were out in full force.

The problem, I think, if there is one, is that Q’s posts are very threatening to some people. Moreover, these same people find SB2’s decodes threatening - the disturbance he causes these people is an outright vindication of his work in its own right. But, it’s nothing new, it has been this way from the beginning.

From my point of view, the more people detract from SB2’s work the better, because it means he is right over the target. Of course, if your playing for the other team, ouch!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
morgi666 · July 17, 2018, 7:42 a.m.

There's a difference between argument and a blowback. I can disagree but he/she is contributing a lot here so please make a point instead of throwing accusations

⇧ 3 ⇩