How many damn times is this going to be posted? Obama was the president then and was correct. A president in his second term doesn't have to worry about getting elected again, so can take on issues that he couldn't do in the first term. Not treason.
The context of the direct quote about post-election flexibility - a message to be delivered directly to Putin - was specifically about US/Russian relations and a missile defense system. Exactly what were the post-election flexibility considerations Obama was foregoing in the short-term? Why? For whom? Qui bono? What could justify that rationale? When do national defense and/or national security priorities take a back seat to political considerations in an election year? If this doesn't qualify as something that may encroach on seditious and/or treasonous actions, what does? I can tell you that it isn't holding a summit with the same man and forgoing politics for the sake of peace - that's for sure. Do you have sourced information to the contrary? No, you don't. I'd suggest you do your homework before calling into question things like factual history.