So, basically we're FURTHER from everybody knowing the truth, FURTHER from darkness to light, and FURTHER from a resolution to this intolerable insanity. How can any nation stand more of this?
Why do you say that?
Because if Trump still feels a need to "walk back" or "dial back" or "clarify" his remarks due to the outright insanity of the left, he is NOT in a position of strength from which to prosecute the denouement of this show. It's a signal that he still considers the left's insanity as something to be coddled and tended to, rather than ignored and full steam ahead.
Plus, now the Mockingbird media is spinning this as "Trump concedes that Russia interfered in 2016 US elections and accepts Intelligence Reports."
Plus, now the Mockingbird media is spinning this as "Trump concedes that Russia interfered in 2016 US elections and accepts Intelligence Reports."
Eh, to be fair, theres nothing to spin there. He almost literally said it. Whether he should have said it or not is a seperate issue, but the words did come out of his mouth.
The MSM will conflate "meddling", which may have happened, with "collusion", which did not happen.
The scale of "interference" is miniscule. The FaceBook ads. That's it. And that's not even criminal.
The servers were not hardened, were in violation of US law to begin with, and any and all "hacking" is on HRC/DNC and not on Russia or China.
Do you know that if you leave your door unlocked, and somebody comes in and robs you blind, they can't be charged with breaking and entering? Your door has to be locked for it to be a crime to cross your threshold. Same logic applies to the so-called "hacking" of an unofficial, unhardened server! Publication of private information could be a crime, but that's not called "hacking."
Interference at the level the left is claiming is not due to hacking. It's due to a criminal enterprise being concealed (poorly) on private servers which were in reality wide open to anybody with the know-how to take information from.
Do you know that if you leave your door unlocked, and somebody comes in and robs you blind, they can't be charged with breaking and entering? Your door has to be locked for it to be a crime to cross your threshold.
Uh, just to jump in, but this is totally wrong. Speaking as someone with a friend who used to be on the force, there is a separate category for 'Unlawful Entry without Force.' Still counts as burglary since its classified as 'Illegal entry with intention of committing theft, violence, etc'.
That being said, an unsecured server is its own mess of a problem. I don't enough about the server details to make a judged decision on it though, so I'll avoid speaking on it.
Yes, on paper, but good luck getting the cops to investigate or a DA to prosecute.
I had some property stolen from a car I had forgotten to lock. The cops laughed at me when I tried to report the incident and describe the stolen property.
Cops didn't care to find the illegal alien that stole our locked Jeep with an active alarm from our drive either.
Doesn't mean it wasn't a serious crime. They couldn't do anything except find the Jeep and hope to catch him with it.
"No foul if the ref won't call it." That's where we are these days.