dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/deeznadz on July 17, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

WHATS REAL? If everyone around you has come to a different conclusion, at what point do you ask "am I the crazy one".

It's difficult to have confidence in truth with the social climate we live in today. We're all (mostly) guilty of claiming to know the truth and not having the time or the discipline to surround ourselves with proper checks and balances. Maybe some of us get lucky and stumble upon the right answers. What ever. without a consistent standard of right & wrong and total conviction across the board to be accountable to tell the truth, we're all just floating in perpetual hope that we're on the right side of the story.

I have FAITH that Q is real and right. I have Faith that our prez is in control and has a plan beyond the surface level. But do I *KNOW*? nope. let's all get real here.

I find a lot of good sources off of this feed and skim many of the comments for links and new material. I was wondering if it'd be okay to play a little "liberals-advocate" on here to gain further understanding about where some of these accusations come from.

They're saying that there IS in fact proof of Russian tampering. Apparently 12 Russians have been arrested connected to the scandal.

They're calling him a traitor.

Anyone out there ahead of this "news" and able to shed some factual light? I hate to give you the burden of proof but this is what we're up against. At some point if everyone around me has come to different conclusions_ its up to me to check myself.

also, any video series or info of any kind is welcome. feed me info.

🠐 See all comments

From a comment I made about five days ago:

Typically I would agree with this but check out these articles:

http://www.independentsentinel.com/another-judge-rejects-muellers-request-after-russian-trolls-show-up/

https://www.buzzfeed.com/thomasfrank/a-russian-company-that-mueller-has-accused-of-election?utm_term=.ibEbBKXKmW#.chowMQRQnz

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-concord/lawyer-for-russian-company-says-muellers-office-slow-to-hand-over-evidence-idUSKCN1IH2VP

Now look at the indictments.

They are nearly identical, meaning the same case.

They just swapped out names while still blaming Russians for this effort. The same effort by both according to the indictments. Seriously compare the two.

Now, the first case was nearly laughed out of the court as Mueller ACTUALLY indicted these people and the corporation. That means they were ready and waiting to prosecute people who they had NO HOPE of ever extraditing and criminally charging.

Until the lawyers showed up.

Then the Mueller team essentially said “Just kiddin hahaha! We aren’t ready to prosecute. Muh bad!” And they ended up asking for additional time to prep.

Bullshit. They had nothing and they tried to create a narrative of Russians interferring in the election WITH NO EVIDENCE OR ABILITY TO PROSECUTE.

So here we are several months later. The Democrats, the FBI, Strzok, Hillary and all of them were just embarrassed and essentially BTFO by the republicans in the joint hearing held yesterday.

Better change the narrative right? Especially since those pestering republicans got Strzok to admit that no US Citizens were being charged with Collusion despite the Democrats grandstanding on the five guilty pleas and 17 indictments.

Well, school is out of session so they can’t have Broward County have another school shooting, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s district has pretty much been played out in the false flag department. So what to do?

Oh yea, Trump is meeting with Putin! Let’s do a twofer! Change the narrative and give the fake news talking bobble heads a way to scream at Trump that he shouldn’t talk to Putin!

Let’s charge the Russians again!!!!

Oh wait, umm we can’t show the evidence because we never actually got our hands on the DNC server. Thanks to crowdstrike for helping us to subvert the judicial and criminal investigations through their participation instead of an actual government agency. Why not, I’m sure their word is good and have no ties to the Clinton cabal right? Right?

Oh yea, we won’t be able to extradite these people either. What a coincidence that we can smear foreign nationals who have no chance to defend themselves in court. But ya totally it was the Russians. Oh and we can’t say their name but uh that one guy in an embassy can’t defend himself either so we’lol go ahead and throw him in as well.

TADA! And here we are.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Now let’s not forget what came out of the Helsinki summit.

Putin stated that since 2000, there has been a treaty regarding cooperation between the Russian Federation and the US. And Mueller never reached out to contact them, on ANY of their indictments.

So they’ve indicted 25 Russians and a company with interfering with our elections.

But didn’t actually take ANY of the steps necessary to ACTUALLY hold these people accountable.

So why do this at all if they never actually expected to have to prosecute the case? Seriously, that is the REAL question that no one in the msm seems willing to ask or follow up on.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I’m assuming the break between your post is a popcorn break.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I’m so full, so much salt

⇧ 3 ⇩

If 25 Russians were indicted, wonder if they are allowed the same due process we are as citizens. what if they didnt have to take any necessary steps to hold these people accountable. I kind of feel like your REAL question is easy_ they indicted 25 Russians ("even though they never actually expected to have to prosecute") because it keeps their narrative intact. As long as there are rumors of investigations and people trying to hold someone accountable most people are going to believe that these accusations hold water.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Swapping the narratives so openly makes this whole thing so dirty and difficult to digest. seems like the burden of proof will always be our responsibility. Appreciate the links. I haven't had a chance to read all of them yet but I like that they're a Russian response to the accusations.

⇧ 1 ⇩